From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#25484: QEMU depends on two different version of libjpeg Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:00:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871svzxk53.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUDHJ-0007jF-27 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:01:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUDGw-0000rF-UY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:01:25 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUDGw-0000r3-SB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:01:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUDGw-0003FP-Hf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:01:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <871svzxk53.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 25484@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > While building ‘qemu’ as of 840f38ba37af1d09eb1e896a6350d6ab7f6532d0, we > see: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ld: warning: libjpeg.so.62, needed by /gnu/store/9a3r8wjnfyxfc912i6inlw8k6pw3rlxy-spice-0.12.8/lib/libspice-server.so, may conflict with libjpeg.so.8 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Indeed, ‘guix graph -t references qemu’ shows ‘libjpeg’ and > ‘libjpeg-turbo’ as indirect dependencies. > > Any idea how to fix that? “libjpeg-turbo” is used by “spice” but I just built “spice” successfully with “libjpeg-8” instead of “libjpeg-turbo”. This seems to be okay. ~~ Ricardo