From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:40:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfj5e-00017d-TU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 03:40:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfj5Z-0007bq-Kl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 03:40:42 -0400 Received: from venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.30]:50874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfj5Z-0007bb-5Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 03:40:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > This patch updates to OpenSSL to 1.1.0. > > I don't think we should update now; basically nothing works yet with th= e > new interface. > > But, I could adapt the patch to add this version as openssl-next. > > Your thoughts? I also read about lots of breakage due to the update so I think it=E2=80=99= s okay to add it as =E2=80=9Copenssl-next=E2=80=9D for now. ~~ Ricardo