From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 11 little Ruby gems.
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:22:09 +0100
Message-ID: <idj1tcc498u.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
References: <idjwpvq7mnv.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<CAJ=RwfYd=xOCa8BXYLT6sqSzuu9H-Wt4aHwEt1NrD709GTVzEw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38383)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1ZsCRc-0003BB-9W
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:22:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1ZsCRX-0000vy-BD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:22:24 -0400
Received: from sinope.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.23]:43179)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1ZsCRX-0000vr-2X
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:22:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJ=RwfYd=xOCa8BXYLT6sqSzuu9H-Wt4aHwEt1NrD709GTVzEw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Thompson, David <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:

> Hey Ricardo,
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Ricardo Wurmus
> <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> attached are a couple of patches that resulted from a recent attempt t=
o
>> traverse the dependency graph for a dependency of some tool I wanted t=
o
>> package.
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m not happy with =E2=80=980007-gnu-Add-ruby-rb-fsevent.patch=
=E2=80=99 because it is to
>> be used on a Mac OSX, but unfortunately this is a required input for
>> a more general file system library that is in my pipeline.
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m also not happy with disabling tests for =E2=80=98ruby-yard=
=E2=80=99, but I didn=E2=80=99t
>> find a way to make them pass.
>
> I pushed the first 6 patches with only a couple of minor
> comment/description tweaks.  Still need to look into what can be done
> about patch 7 and the test suite for yard.

Ping!

I think rb-fsevent may not be required after all.  I packaged
ruby-listen and ruby-rb-inotify; =E2=80=9Clisten=E2=80=9D probably only u=
ses rb-fsevent
when on a Mac.

Since we already fixed the yard problem I would really like to push the
three or four (with =E2=80=9Crb-fsevent=E2=80=9D) Ruby packages and move =
on.  These are
the remaining packages:

    ruby-rb-fsevent
    ruby-rubygems-tasks
    ruby-ffi
    ruby-simplecov-html

I have ruby-rb-inotify ready, but it depends on ruby-ffi; and
ruby-listen depends on ruby-rb-inotify.

~~ Ricardo