From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add PePr. Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:51:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lhap4rsa.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47481) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aahuL-0006nW-99 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 05:52:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aahuH-0000Kw-8V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 05:52:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lhap4rsa.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> From 6aa9c0cb97350d5cccb43a78e69e2b8887347df0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Ricardo Wurmus >> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:37:03 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add PePr. >> >> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (pepr): New variable. > > [...] > >> + (modify-phases %standard-phases >> + (add-after 'unpack 'disable-egg >> + (lambda _ >> + (substitute* "setup.py" >> + (("from setuptools import setup") >> + "from distutils.core import setup")) > > It would be nice if we had a bug ID or something to refer to this issue= : > we don=E2=80=99t want to duplicate the explanation everywhere, yet it=E2= =80=99d be nice > to have a pointer to the explanation. WDYT? I added a comment with a link to an upstream bug report. >> + (description >> + "PePr is a ChIP-Seq peak calling or differential binding analysi= s tool >> +that is primarily designed for data with biological replicates. It u= ses a >> +negative binomial distribution to model the read counts among the sam= ples in >> +the same group, and look for consistent differences between ChIP and = control >> +group or two ChIP groups run under different conditions. PePr was pu= blished >> +on Bioinformatics on Jun 2014.") > > I=E2=80=99d remove the last sentence. Done. Pushed as d1e3282. Thanks! ~~ Ricardo