From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id gHMzONuaI2eybgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 14:57:32 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id gHMzONuaI2eybgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:57:32 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurile.net header.s=selector1 header.b="X/8ucNkb"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1730386651; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=dnHY6bdq/YziWrdN87bA35BfYM9VVut9r0yFjPY4m0M=; b=ETZ6AJXhmmdDy/qj2hR4dm4I1IZHD+F2eTB4ulWdmEWXjCBt+rTUrGYOoTfHsppgw0jo2o wIrnN9APkuqwpoOBWgEcxTt/uIPSjq0MFuTWBxbUIBXIRI6u5siEgUAMDRs9uXYyVI6ZZ+ fb/Jku/t/4Itr8cD/rTdVPsKBmaxJdCgsyl1VvEneKN9E+cjo9QJMekL0fyu+oX+ESGHzU tBLcECsgcYwHX93NWWD+TCRBLrwT414uxldEXFwPXE+xfr+10RdkLyoNL1WCqvdQFF3kCk OQSQggCPiW+c79y66t9vOS6766UBpTs79lwQEWYQc9KaTRXoWN4giQan8Pqjyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurile.net header.s=selector1 header.b="X/8ucNkb"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1730386651; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jdLqcnhU6sYaFOjzn+hlzEmaiPYZAkcfojxiPYJU2m+6QbqKu4ygTY3bbsfulken2xBPqx URRjKIe2eN7tHVx8MdfpOe34VLCk8erGLZ5sfNt3lDP1R5fJymMI/NkDVnrQ2q7vqst1Zf VzIlFnzAU6mpb/hZUlyPCO0ji+//iaovrOgn/MicjTnwfg0nzc1OrPITxmLoR1wpahjugZ iQ17Nadh95ux7hldWRTowA7gjIMspcyvZNgV49fpRtpFCkVdQczfdcMHT8cerWlPU0KORO keP6kP8tN8TrAGnGGZtOhDe8diSSC/XRHFjHOKOzeIAgPFnbSfAPNexqWHNQ/Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632F440013 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:57:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t6WbK-0004pW-64; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:56:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t6WbI-0004p6-15 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:56:40 -0400 Received: from mailtransmit05.runbox.com ([2a0c:5a00:149::26]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t6WbE-00084T-EL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:56:39 -0400 Received: from mailtransmit03.runbox ([10.9.9.163] helo=aibo.runbox.com) by mailtransmit05.runbox.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1t6Wb2-00EAV0-0D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:56:24 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=futurile.net; s=selector1; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=dnHY6bdq/YziWrdN87bA35BfYM9VVut9r0yFjPY4m0M=; b=X/8ucNkbTyn4OkmmMTYRlVq1FH VnRaMNG/AvTnj2S02tG/AsaAt2neQ4BNgwwti18fYvVNMlYWdKdIs871ys29QVpZYCfaTYZQ/wB4S j2uscTSQSpnQIhwQS1f3glrxiDuUfqXPkdcoomjTSEG428HJ0+mlEUNpDL5a7vvo/e8LbLkkFz1C+ J6hZ6ePl8HxYPgiDnmFpAyLptN5dTu87ozQT0NDqtNnHNr/qRKfQLEHOSK6yo6c2HNosxvJRw6Jiq MGtMWF/mBzgv4o/Cl3VPtNrfTxQfjChYzmfwhpEGdtG8dTJb5MY5qyHRDJsObkykdQCEYCPmvCHsm peLa+HMQ==; Received: from [10.9.9.74] (helo=submission03.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t6Wb1-0007YB-Bl; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:56:23 +0100 Received: by submission03.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated ID (641962)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) id 1t6Wam-00Ejwc-IT; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:56:08 +0100 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 14:56:06 +0000 From: Steve George To: Luis Felipe Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Running a Guix User and Contributor survey Message-ID: References: <83b2fb02-f171-4d46-b1f0-9ffccf90d9a5@zoho.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <83b2fb02-f171-4d46-b1f0-9ffccf90d9a5@zoho.com> Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=2a0c:5a00:149::26; envelope-from=steve@futurile.net; helo=mailtransmit05.runbox.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.12 X-Spam-Score: 0.12 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 632F440013 X-TUID: LUU9QgcrnLNA On 30 Oct, Luis Felipe wrote: (...) > On 30/10/24 12:03, Steve George wrote: (...) > I gave it a first look, and I want to see the results already :) Thank-you, appreciate you going through it. (...) > > * The tricky part of running a survey is keeping it to a reasonable length, you > > quickly find there's lots you'd love to know, but the balancing factor is the > > more questions someone has to answer the lower the completion rate! Ideas on > > how to shorten the design while keeping the same areas of enquiry would be > > welcome. > > Personally, I think it is a bit long. Would it make sense to make it two > surveys instead, one for users and one for contributors? > > I'm thinking that if it is perceived as lengthy, people might omit the > free-form questions at the end or be too tired to express themselves as > they'd like to. (...) Yeah, I have the same concern. I'm going to have a look at it when it's laid-up as a questionnaire and see how it seems for filling it out. I'm not sure about splitting it up - I'll give it some serious thought though as your reaction is what I was worrying about. > > * I'm sure there are alternative word options that might be clearer, along with > > the inevitable typos: either a PR (it's on Codeberg where anyone can create an > > account) or a patch would be welcome. > > I only noticed one typo: > > + decison making → decision making > > And two trifles⸮: > > 1. "Guixers" used to refer to "Guix denizens". I would omit it because, to > my knowledge, the community hasn't decided on an English demonym yet (/me > runs and takes cover). > 2. Use of "Linux" in the first and other questions to refer to GNU/Linux > distributions in general. I'd use the latter, to follow the same convention > used in Guix documentation. Thanks for these. Futurile / Steve