From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rene Subject: Re: About GCC-5.5.0 Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 08:30:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6NS5gP1LFQIB0z7F0KrTwSUjfE3VptjXDIyh_Cat5yxILxKmvKjjOiyA5zUzwNfsP0ARyGwKLnK17FNI9LZmKvh8jiq4ZUDiTxahbFND_cA=@protonmail.com> <20180524234130.l4vr6tt435igokvj@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <87in782jsb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Rene Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87in782jsb.fsf@gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-hurd-bounces+gnu-bug-hurd=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Bug-hurd" To: "ludo@gnu.org" Cc: "guix-devel\\@gnu.org" , "bug-hurd\\@gnu.org" , Samuel Thibault List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org Hello Ludovic, >=20 > So it looks like the right-hand size of the =E2=80=98libc_undefs=E2=80= =99 assignment >=20 > expands to the empty string. >=20 > Could you check the value of $NM in there? Could it be that it got it >=20 > wrong? >=20 In the config.log file the $NM value is: NM=3D'nm' Thank you