From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WGPcAxkJHl8iOgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:52:09 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id uPxVOxgJHl81DwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:52:08 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BECB9400C7 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38570 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzpV0-0004KL-4p for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:52:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzpUw-0004Jz-EU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:52:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzpUw-0005Te-4q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:52:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzpUw-0003DI-3V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42473] [PATCH] gnu: zrythm: Update to 0.8.694. Resent-From: Leo Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42473 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Alexandros Theodotou , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 42473@debbugs.gnu.org, GNU Guix maintainers , Maxim Cournoyer Received: via spool by 42473-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42473.159580391512340 (code B ref 42473); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 42473) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2020 22:51:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53552 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzpUp-0003Cy-8X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:51:55 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:28457) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzpUm-0003Co-7E for 42473@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:51:53 -0400 Received: from nijino.local (213-147-177-210.hdsl.highway.telekom.at [213.147.177.210]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BFJ8j0vmnz1LLyf; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:51:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4BFJ8j0vmnz1LLyf DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1595803909; bh=U8lvgmUU/WKub5Zdr0B87cojXi/DZpFQQp3ldamNdas=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HvJ2I4P071yenXnaXQjMlM6OaZ4qS5gnw9dtvVT79fYRRmJ2SGcdQmF3AE2P/WiBF UZVP4a4z+GACB/aHW4y6Y1vcjQrEIu1sE+L08r2Jkbb4TMaetqoZogTv+vjUbMI1mo vbRpi7c1MpMVuUGErTpC4avSjym1ZySN1WD+RGXo= Message-ID: From: Leo Prikler Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:51:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0f9e1795910b17cdd4d73f3b4848276f5da09889.camel@zrythm.org> References: <0e6300fea9caa1f9d7645c968a7c5b50d89f7b5c.camel@zrythm.org> <87k0yvfb60.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo2vdj6d.fsf@gmail.com> <871rkydx1j.fsf@nckx> <0f9e1795910b17cdd4d73f3b4848276f5da09889.camel@zrythm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=HvJ2I4P0; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=student.tugraz.at (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.59 X-TUID: s+vm45JzCJkV Am Sonntag, den 26.07.2020, 20:26 +0100 schrieb Alexandros Theodotou: > > I'd love to see a trademark policy that doesn't mention Guix (or > > *anyone*) by name but gives us (and *anyone*) the freedom to do > > what we want to do: responsibly but independently maintain & > > redistribute a well-integrated, CVE-free ZRythm package. I'm > > aware that I might be hoping for too much :-) > > While I wish I could do that as well, there are no other similar > examples to follow afaik and IANAL so I don't know how to put that > wording in legal terms that cannot be abused (giving permission to > *anyone* to do things with a trademark beyond what basic trademark > law > allows does not sound like a good idea), besides giving specific > permission to trusted projects like GNU Guix, so I try to stay on the > safe side. IANAL either, but instead of ``` You may distribute unaltered copies of Zrythm that include the Zrythm trademarks without express permission from Alexandros Theodotou. ``` and ``` However, if you make any changes to Zrythm, you may not redistribute that product using any Zrythm trademark without Alexandros Theodotou’s prior written consent. ``` you should write something like ``` You may distribute unaltered copies of Zrythm that include the Zrythm trademarks without express permission from Alexandros Theodotou. You may further distribute altered copies of Zrythm that include the Zrythm trademarks, provided that alterations solely serve the purposes of: - porting Zrythm to a platform or free software distribution not already supported by Zrythm as-is, OR - fixing a bug in Zrythm, that has already been acknowledged by Alexandros Theodotou or [a bigger authority, e.g. there's a CVE], OR - ... In any case, you must preserve [bla bla bla], also you must provide (a link to)? the original sources. If you make any other changes, you may not redistribute that product... ``` Roughly meaning: If it already works on Ubuntu, you shan't patch it to make it work on Ubuntu. If it doesn't work on Gentoo, you can patch it until it works on Gentoo and no further. If Alexandros Theodotou has a bugfix for something already published in Git, but you need to backport that fix, you can do it. If there's a CVE you can patch it. If any of those patches goes beyond integration/bugfixing, that's a violation. I personally believe, that this should be clear enough in most cases, but it needs slightly better legalese. Regards, Leo