From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MNeKCTIQwl8weAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:54:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id GaAxBTIQwl9ICAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:54:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE5149404CF for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35546 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kivzc-00015F-Tw for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:54:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kivzW-00014w-AC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:54:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kivzW-0006oa-2s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:54:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kivzV-0004cu-VZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:54:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44882] Dependencies issues References: <55bea941-e029-69b7-0603-5548567659ef@mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: <55bea941-e029-69b7-0603-5548567659ef@mailbox.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1s_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Ort=C3=ADn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Fern=C3=A1ndez?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44882 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 44882@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44882-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44882.160655361617751 (code B ref 44882); Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 44882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2020 08:53:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46928 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kivz6-0004cE-J5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:53:36 -0500 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.152]:33192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kivz1-0004bw-48 for 44882@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:53:35 -0500 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cjldc3jKNzQlX1 for <44882@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:53:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:mime-version:date:date:message-id:subject:subject :from:from:received; s=mail20150812; t=1606553601; bh=/WM1GmnXoz 4hsEssQNXFqlGD509ZqNSmvIgLxEReJhM=; b=VaVrQM23vi/KgwnkLBZh/mil9U meQMKkkX5VxMgwuzmiFnKpgE4c0q5Ziz0WCm6Nhr0E9uzm0PKAoTS/H47+DbqlXG 93IqaOdfrNcGUcED3d/nF1dEKr+eyUWUM19adGVLqHgWpgZLKrBT+6+lnhGWyDSR gD447kiWFNlbhI70mDSFKv53czT4LII4u9AjEzxJt4rlH/QrZX8tZmTGtO10RRuU D+WOJzvIhe67kxqenyQhQvVKFpLhHtSAsz4CtciL9I35UebTUF3WLyi5ZR1Xo4tB LSKCzw9dtNhpOububAjunIcsc/10w2aXdQe1JAogyKQbBp2kCPpSdFWrbrZg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1606553602; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/WM1GmnXoz4hsEssQNXFqlGD509ZqNSmvIgLxEReJhM=; b=A3+SdtBBNOrUVK0U9S5CGQAVEDVoOel7vdx7zWOl/2dZ5rq4BSDrEHIacbh+ZsKFjZXYYX BnKR6skPGuHnd9XF0/fZaN3nvo94AfmpoeeyYro9WbkhlZv9RpI6xiCNeNM5jCmRb68ZtA 3AK6NGmJ80FrzOD4tj1FQY0qg/T96uKnZXT/JLvZwRJDVt2tz6Kt0dWRYO+4Kl4KEARbd9 DW8oL4vgNvDXANgsBLnHiV249YBLckkkDPVFpN16xHE2fLf6rd9/cgBFUrfLKsEPJTzXph qUgnalICtcbbHTpggkclHOfJeDwzoiHygjvsuAOTcw7rPt9Zx9to+m99B9tSMg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by hefe.heinlein-support.de (hefe.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.172]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id HcR2rm-02E88 for <44882@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:53:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:53:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MBO-SPAM-Probability: X-Rspamd-Score: -1.86 / 15.00 / 15.00 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8C666665 X-Rspamd-UID: 4172fd X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Tomás Ortín Fernández , Tomás Ortín Fernández via Guix-patches From: Tomás Ortín Fernández via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.77 X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=VaVrQM23; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=A3+SdtBB; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-TUID: AP7DWmDSa9d5 Hello, I have realized this patch isn't correct. I hadn't tested it on a clean environment before. Solargraph requires Rubocop 0.52 (!). In fact, the current version of Solargraph doesn't currently work, either: there are version issues with Rubocop and with ruby-thor. I need a more-or-less current Solargraph and Rubocop, that's why I have been updating some packages, but I realize now I wasn't doing it properly and that I'm getting tangled into a web of dependencies issues. How should I proceed? Clearly Rubocop should be updated, but I don't know how to keep Solargraph working and how to figure out which packages will need to be updated or checked in case they need an older version of Rubocop. I'm quite new to all of this, so sorry if I'm not doing things how I'm supposed to! Tomás