From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
To: Csepp <raingloom@riseup.net>,
"Maxim Cournoyer" <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>,
宋文武 <iyzsong@envs.net>, "Bruno Victal" <mirai@makinata.eu>,
"Andy Tai" <atai@atai.org>
Cc: 65391@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:52:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdf86517-7aac-a2e3-223b-23e6ef7a90d5@telenet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cyzcbau0.fsf@riseup.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1841 bytes --]
> [Two mails previously]
> Also the CI UI could use some improvements. I'm pretty sure I've
> mentioned this before, but there is no easy way to find out which
> inputs I need to fix to make a dependency failure disappear.
> [...]
> That is precisely what the linear search algorithm is. I should not
> have to look through the dependency tree to figure out if two package
> failures have the same cause, or to know how many (possibly indirect)
> dependencies of a package are failing.
> As an example, pandoc often fails to build on i686, but when you look at
> the CI page, you see that it was caused by several of its inputs
> failing, all due to some of *their* dependencies.
> Now, you could dig down on one branch of the dependency DAG and find one
> failing package, but that doesn't *actually* answer the question: "what
> packages do I need to fix to enable this one?", because it could have
> multiple failing inputs instead of just one. The only way to tell is to
> look at each page, that means having to visually find each failing input
> on the page, wait for their CI pages to load, and repeat the whole
> process.
> If your browser is not particularly fast or you aren't so quick at
> navigating a webpage, this can take a while.
> But for the CI server, generating this information would take less than
> a second > Maybe some people value their time so little that they are fine with
> doing this the manual way, but personally I have better things to do.
ci.guix.gnu.org loads fast enough for me in my experience, but I do
agree that more automation is good!
(I usually don't respond to e-mails I agree with except for
superficialities, but I was wondering if such non-replies are actually
interpreted as such, or as disagreements, or neither.)
Best regards,
Maxime Devos.
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 929 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 236 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-29 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-19 23:53 bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that Maxime Devos
2023-08-22 23:45 ` Csepp
2023-08-24 9:57 ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-24 17:23 ` Csepp
2023-08-24 14:52 ` Maxime Devos
2023-08-24 17:27 ` Csepp
2023-08-29 22:52 ` Maxime Devos [this message]
2023-08-30 2:36 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-24 15:02 ` Maxime Devos
2023-08-24 17:38 ` Csepp
2023-08-27 1:13 ` 宋文武
2023-08-27 3:38 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-27 8:16 ` bug#65391: [Cuirass] feature requests for dashboard 宋文武 via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-08-27 3:39 ` bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-27 4:30 ` Bruno Victal
2023-08-27 15:07 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2023-08-27 16:24 ` bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even Andy Tai
2023-08-27 21:26 ` Andy Tai
[not found] ` <handler.65391.B.169248925726403.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
2023-08-29 14:03 ` bug#65391: Acknowledgement (People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that) Maxime Devos
2023-08-29 14:45 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-29 22:44 ` Maxime Devos
2023-08-30 2:28 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-30 10:39 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-08-30 19:12 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-07 11:53 ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-11 8:30 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-11 14:00 ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-11 23:12 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-12 0:39 ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-30 11:50 ` Maxime Devos
2023-09-07 11:32 ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-11 7:28 ` bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that Csepp
2023-09-11 7:58 ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-11 21:52 ` Csepp
2023-09-12 18:43 ` bug#65391: Acknowledgement (People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that) Maxime Devos
2023-08-30 10:29 ` 宋文武 via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2024-02-14 9:13 ` bug#65391: Close Andreas Enge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdf86517-7aac-a2e3-223b-23e6ef7a90d5@telenet.be \
--to=maximedevos@telenet.be \
--cc=65391@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=atai@atai.org \
--cc=iyzsong@envs.net \
--cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
--cc=mirai@makinata.eu \
--cc=raingloom@riseup.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.