From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Isaac Subject: Re: Thunderbird Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:56:04 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20170718171336.nwr4vk6uxlxmj4iv@abyayala> <87inich4k3.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20170728173117.dresjucctkml6e7j@abyayala> <874lsfefn3.fsf@openmailbox.org> <19fee2b9.AEEAQKqUR8QAAAAAAAAAAAOu6r8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZtiwD@mailjet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drSTX-0003o4-LP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:26:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drSTU-0003sQ-Hm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:26:23 -0400 Received: from o168.p8.mailjet.com ([87.253.233.168]:58281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drSTU-0003r3-Ak for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:26:20 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Catonano Cc: guix-devel > Perhaps, claws-mail or blasa are better alternatives. Both >> claws-mail and balsa are already packaged for Guix. >> > I didn t know I'm not saying we shouldn't package astroid mail. Just making an observation... > In my view, those make the Thunderbird case even more desperate ;-) Like ng0 said, no one is going to embrace the task of getting Thunderbird into Guix with joy. :-P =