From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnTTh-0003DJ-U4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:42:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnTTe-00028r-R4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:42:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnTTe-00028i-Nl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:42:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnTTe-00069S-Cf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:42:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober. Resent-Message-ID: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Arun Isaac Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 23:11:26 +0530 In-reply-to: <87lglzrhr7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lglzrhr7.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 28281@debbugs.gnu.org > For clarity, what about (1) using ‘find-files’ instead of ‘ftw’ I started with something like that and switched to `ftw' for slightly shorter code. But, I guess clarity is more important. > (2) separating code that builds the list of files from code that calls > ‘install-file’? Sure, will do. I'll send an updated patch with both changes incorporated. This package is really so messed up. I don't know why they couldn't have just provided us with a Makefile for installation. Sigh...