From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0J9oItuAmGYjHAAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 02:41:31 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0J9oItuAmGYjHAAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 04:41:31 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=aFrKMgzb; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1721270491; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=xf/WK3++qkYVmTfpO6f5p1q7+vxTysAAiqsdyPD4v6Y=; b=D1TdwHHtTBTUTewuoweNLCdDUJh6DogxdbVgba/kPcGUOhBod/7Wi2OnrG/qvURjOMh7zc y5AbmcHf9h9bBz32IbNlgOfwx/nVWmp5kiOard4/GPe6Vr0Zi6Z++yHlSFRiezV4CLxcV3 mb3nUOXfhFve0B6HXHe/ViH+TdJS90G8Gk/z37PyOLh5/KxkpxO3y2HELCFPlHGdg0NMK+ h/tRwxnuQKqKlvjeFmIQd+XELkrgJdIVYPaKAbeiP8CAq3ZR9xsKi/E3H9vlcZ8fyEM0k5 IAPuj8i0hvIh82PHwFUAi7zx5GWg9OGswHOV4/J0+QWgzi6CvpLIDfvb9znxdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=aFrKMgzb; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1721270491; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BPG2biiaTz1aKmeOaBxfurG9YZldMIwTAQsds2MqTVmUroPvsiAXSk5s1l+D0+6ZEiIyaY TMa2BNAdQgBHPsgf2cB5rtx4+dlKxGWRblUmf/URtVjG11lw6UEXsSSGFDuNj2aReLe+Gk KucmnL0QKtR06rzc04a2la3xa4T/dUJBTVpZVxq+N9q+65ZvC8V5oqoGfozuobVawmfxWB oB5hg9zRcQv25woYcbwZwnZJnb8O8qKSfIlJzqFOD4y/kvbEl4DY99vP/GBxvbjgm1EV/i lHbAqOWCcC9mRMWXv6T2pJrA+q2HZ8YU/tAW8EbkOgMeYDyn/0Vl1Vw8LGRvQA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F34E3E5E0 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 04:41:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sUH4V-0000H9-28; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:40:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sUH4T-0000Cb-SW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:40:41 -0400 Received: from mx2.dismail.de ([159.69.191.136]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sUH4R-0000il-L7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:40:41 -0400 Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eaea7087; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 04:40:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=xf/WK3++qkYVmTfpO6f5p1q7+vxTysAAiqsdyPD4v6Y=; b=aFrKMgzbkGGz ig1J2i+8S8OcuPhkMzQQb0nNGDSxVs8rKJ16ly1Hl4d66ZVudL8t1jIvniEVMdDc lYtXu2wqd68+ezs4T91dwuryehEbTbw6FqP2SPkT2ngaXT86uoPitpHO3B226+tZ zBgb65m/PR0iY8tlNzzYxwtQIc7i+L5ZBF+0gJSJkfdaettizq4TH9HQjtfykD25 pVGRxn2dlOBeHprjdkUZOE1UTJAU4STg2lsTNrWs5AaanzvuCF48YmPL39405r+b EJPcIyOk9UlUYMqJKyt8m9tN9q6lpQv1JEvmAc190AQnqQJpaEu0PhtSkclT5D4w NsV7wAa04g== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 512d1ce7; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 04:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f11c877f; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 04:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d8683a0b (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 18 Jul 2024 04:40:32 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 02:40:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "jgart" Message-ID: TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: gunicorn and CVE-2024-1135 To: "Leo Famulari" Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: <4a1b351d338405125e9b5a4c6f868b27ad109ae6@dismail.de> <651ba6daed4e305955a43dd1a20487bf95b8b1c5@dismail.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.69.191.136; envelope-from=jgart@dismail.de; helo=mx2.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4F34E3E5E0 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -11.02 X-Spam-Score: -11.02 X-TUID: f/IKaOQB7Syh > Okay. Is there a reason to create gunicorn-next rather than updating >=20 >=20gunicorn? Hi Leo, Yes, time. Updating the packages that depend on that bad gunicorn will ta= ke time which I don't have at the moment to fix them, unfortunately. I might not be able to get to updating all those packages until maybe up = to 2 or more weeks from now depending on how busy I am. > Otherwise, Guix will not build, and we won't have successfully mitigate= d >=20 >=20the vulnerability for our users. Yep, I just made the gunicorn-next package available for anyone that want= s to use it but it's not integrated into the dependents as listed by `gui= x refresh -l gunicorn@20.1.0`. It is standalone. If anyone would like to work on it before I am able to get to it feel fre= e. I just thought I'd let people know here in case it is higher priority for= anyone else. all best, jgart