From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id kPVpKZBiX2DirwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:51:28 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id qLNEI5BiX2CjVAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 16:51:28 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9AC21FD95 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:51:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQC9n-0001td-5o for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:51:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQC9M-0001tF-W4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:51:01 -0400 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:33245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQC9H-0002lh-26 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:51:00 -0400 Received: from guix-xps.local (82-64-145-38.subs.proxad.net [82.64.145.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 12RGokor010962 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:50:46 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 12RGokor010962 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1616863849; bh=Wol3eUg5PvYVL8UMEnIET8uTZB2zuEynKkmfmMyDbYM=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iskPrjYQgR8SGqvji6B/Rw3XPYnJ9Zu50yCkmSb8tMEzt2PLSKfUxEKsWK9EdZKe+ JtYndaa479n+kfEA6FqeTn4omdu2z5HXUlYn0ix2okFNtNCnAEroljgwWfy9U7td6G rdbhp/FZYFdT/z5nHIP1avH+++hzUkaAhpIlSgDk= Message-ID: Subject: Re: Document our WIP From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter To: Luis Felipe Cc: Vincent Legoll , Ricardo Wurmus , guix-devel Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:50:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <87v99cslkn.fsf@elephly.net> <85fc61d7b51db5f2fd58991f41bd18975307bb6f.camel@zaclys.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vuPzObmsgYwan3SjJxTm" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.33.93.72; envelope-from=lle-bout@zaclys.net; helo=mail.zaclys.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1616863888; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Wol3eUg5PvYVL8UMEnIET8uTZB2zuEynKkmfmMyDbYM=; b=VHvOfhzHsfiWr/9TAa/nx/s5rE8a4t/XLVe9i7W/kBoMquP/R+DJTX0LLNWUc2Al49ezw+ +Pc+Pasfi6qQPVWbJelfWco1bK9qRFxHqiWev42Bojy2lYPrwXjsbC3T10Qk2cRtSzHwvd IcX8GYpUqoEBXZ9c1yXtje5BDXqPv2frM/qBBwi/RWhzJ83CY/1xIDAt7n26h+M/n5SWf1 e6EfAzjxayXUv55smNjQftjWZJRP7I5haVL17F2wqt1OjVJO8i7ClEjMe5FHdUP7lraBCi PpW213bhTd7zg4+LXWi1sHZLw0yLGufVuiddjyheusyhQCUM0efHTdswPo4v7g== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1616863888; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DVD7lh0cWgZeC47sZ19W+J9GXzzAqe2U4Vcec9YYeiboqtgJ+zCsnPh8UICtdvGa0Eorx2 LQFyJrc737RlHnAbHnQ9/RLcBE4bHpiR95c5T2tVrc1nd63m9LrlOCWG8hgLWYKsooz/7G mQSf2iATNuetmEbjOWxLHlcntvsK0uJQKyYx5ivUsnFP/b+w8l+25paJQHEijJHADpxpSH RABC9uEUo01kIWstDlx7Bj2l7Wp4AIDVeb7Oev+LB4MikTLrR85PVYw67ZHu2G8k3CGUFu /sywlbZZRUOPUxmt5toApU+OCX8eHtlZRDOM7NBEV8A9Hvt+zdmYyF1cWemMfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=zaclys.net header.s=default header.b=iskPrjYQ; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.72 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=zaclys.net header.s=default header.b=iskPrjYQ; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=zaclys.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E9AC21FD95 X-Spam-Score: -3.72 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: A2/J5dDEpK61 --=-vuPzObmsgYwan3SjJxTm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 16:42 +0000, Luis Felipe wrote: > I'm fine with that too (for now). I can send that patch. >=20 > The reason I didn't suggest that, though, is that the primary menu > has already grown too big in my opinion. And, with the current > design, the visibility of the primary menu changes depending on > screen width: The primary menu is hidden behind a primary menu button > for screens narrower than 920 px (which may be too soon already). >=20 > So, adding more primary items to that menu means the menu has to be > hidden for even wider screens than 920. An that's from the English > point of view only; I haven't checked how the header bar is behaving > for other locales... >=20 > That said, I have a pending proposal to redesign the header bar to > behave similar to headers in GNOME desktop applications (it could be > simpler and follow already used conventions that people may be > familiar with). After looking more closely at the help page, I think it could be acceptable to have it there too. But is the wiki an help resource? --=-vuPzObmsgYwan3SjJxTm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmBfYmUACgkQRaix6GvN EKYC/A//b1MBX0SUn6M3D3UwEHBNjBVtg8zgcukLG98qNEZs4PHwLj+c8zsh8sp9 X2upsilh7w7tOkGChy632eEek5YbXuDG7hYsFiopTd8NpmcfODmKD6RzTDEOk52u Je0vVq5/G5unMri8ehImAIFfqmAcNAvG/6QKopRZ9Aw88HQ9zW5ZLltV1NlFWZO4 XNr5ulGJfjO5NXFT8TauE6AAVFAuJChZVyl6HK1ZycLbeY9ss+Ca3eCGLomhaZgn TgWEdBgyamUQVKHv76+/5jm/Ab2JCotgKTno5EwlPRWSMK7VqewaHFpRczQHPoaa J1sK8X/u+AQ3CaPBT7Y2GjG0CAz2mTUMO89vGR4cUXJUxjdjeESpYwsirtL11RXv ++8NGN9C5JeY+JYTYMfu3nyQNevHSHjUlyN2ATMl5rtIlCeBKR7hjQuW8M+4rfZ5 2d05nsvdZR98UdaEzVo7GiM1eySFf+8CjO2Bn9IQJ/yF8A8v+YK1IkHAbg4Ccm+z K2Yszkx6d27Z7NvYacP8nTzge9DrEz5/blFedS/lbAT7fc36MnsblX2ZLx9OrimI sghp2HsmnC3HvISbMTfE5Wz9PT/X3MIRXcWm3XybaqLRKOb8rcoNhwZuHfIeNVUG EMIUSCk8rG1O2xcvu2EyYS1r7aEapVgrkj17qwOTerazRvyShhM= =7FxD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vuPzObmsgYwan3SjJxTm--