From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Raghav Gururajan" Subject: bug#39646: bug#39648: Reverse my commits on GNOME meta-package Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 01:19:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87ftf2y2gj.fsf@gnu.org> <6bad163b0ed969c5c1117f9fa7446631060a8d4d.camel@disroot.org> <875zg56nq4.fsf@nckx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36189) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5fwB-0007Ya-KI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:20:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5fwA-00089g-N3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:20:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44319) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5fwA-00089c-KL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:20:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j5fwA-00033M-EK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:20:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87ftf2y2gj.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 39646@debbugs.gnu.org, 39648@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludo!=0A=0A> I agree. As a stop-gap measure, I propose to commit the f= ollowing=0A> change real soon. I=E2=80=99ve tested it in a VM; it address= es the points Andy=0A> raised by re-adding the important bits mentioned i= n=0A> .=0A=0ASure, I can do that= .=0A=0A> Raghav, don=E2=80=99t worry, we all make mistakes! We can refine= this calmly=0A> later on.=0A=0AThank you. All good. I just thought rever= sing would be better for time being, but that's okay. :-)=0A=0ARegards,= =0ARG.