From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id K+DpHCPWhF+DQQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:18:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id OBZJGCPWhF+0BQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:18:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D269402DD for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52172 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kS68v-0002bX-3K for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:18:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kS68o-0002bF-2V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:18:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kS68n-0006qj-P5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:18:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kS68n-0007n7-IE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42885] Merge wip-swc Resent-From: Brendan Tildesley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42885 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Arun Isaac , Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 42885@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42885-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42885.160254106529907 (code B ref 42885); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:18:01 +0000 Received: (at 42885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2020 22:17:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kS68W-0007mI-R2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:17:45 -0400 Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.151]:15496) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kS68T-0007m3-N7 for 42885@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:17:43 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.241]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9CjC35mZzKmgD; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:17:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brendan.scot; s=MBO0001; t=1602541053; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ShBunFO4Nbp/9EdiqFaqlwOb0HVXFJgbuGGv1ml6Wg8=; b=LNbFgfweahBpO5OkJCoJTtQYujbw/DGfKN3fEA/zE+2tFGlps2I4TL8YFzWrZdSAmWinsI hfggQdp/31XvhdELCvXwY9NqX1trxo9xU1S25+Tsxk24BMUVhKN6HvuL9OAp32xuoVNno/ cNIDLCEeH0gN1FPSOhD7VN1kCdYoRWR/QgM9faqrXanw6qhc4T275c9CWe7LYwNHTgVRCS yyX7zWyl44hWp/o2rD6K4qHvuUAPEDXBJcECDW11mVZiCBdtxA19jwUTVS1cTKxxx1XHxg C8GD3gWahXS8cfiLtomwg8qqejAsG8C8OvALbg97YGeExTOPRwydH/LliOhI2A== Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter05.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter05.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.123]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id hDYSi8-UZpi4; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:17:32 +0200 (CEST) References: <20200816070318.18642-1-mail@brendan.scot> <20200816070318.18642-2-mail@brendan.scot> <20200824010501.GB14757@jasmine.lan> <87h7sszn4j.fsf@systemreboot.net> <6F7B2CEB-1A83-4B01-B815-1529359169E1@brendan.scot> <87eenwzgoa.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87y2lpvrrd.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh65csve.fsf@systemreboot.net> <871rjhfhtt.fsf@elephly.net> <87y2lj1moa.fsf@systemreboot.net> <877dt3ct7u.fsf@elephly.net> <87sgbq20kw.fsf@systemreboot.net> <874knwbtgv.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87a6xove66.fsf@elephly.net> <87y2l3zaa4.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87pn6eid4c.fsf@systemreboot.net> <7d55f6f8-ff58-c548-8bec-8508a71be2cf@brendan.scot> <87ft6zx1rh.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87a6wr29i2.fsf@systemreboot.net> From: Brendan Tildesley Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 09:17:23 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87a6wr29i2.fsf@systemreboot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-MBO-SPAM-Probability: X-Rspamd-Score: -1.31 / 15.00 / 15.00 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8A51F108B X-Rspamd-UID: 8904ff X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=brendan.scot header.s=MBO0001 header.b=LNbFgfwe; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.49 X-TUID: GZCYBZLaC/dV On 12/10/20 5:23 pm, Arun Isaac wrote: > I have merged wip-swc into master. Should this bug report be closed now? > Is there any pending work here related to calibre? We need a typescript > build system that uses swc. But, we should handle that in a separate bug > report. > > Thanks! Thank you very much. I'm kind of worried how long it will take to get that build system. Even if we have it, will it really succeed at building MathJax so easily? If it's going to take a while, I'm tempted to just update Calibre without mathjax support. In theory I'm willing to do work to help but it all seems rather advanced for me, so i'm glad to see you make progress. What's the next step? Calibre 5+ is out now which is on python3. I could even create a calibre-next so that both calibre@4.18.0 exists and calibre will be calibre@5.0.1, utilizing Guix's design.