From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id GJoxK+MKBmR+BwAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 16:46:43 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id UBopK+MKBmRxjwAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 16:46:43 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96BF43E381 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 16:46:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZD2S-0001V3-La; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:46:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZD2K-0001SI-KG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:46:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZD2K-0004O0-Bq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:46:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZD2K-0003xN-7U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:46:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#61852: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible Resent-From: Andrew Whatson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:46:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61852 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 61852@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61852.167811754813842 (code B ref 61852); Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:46:04 +0000 Received: (at 61852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2023 15:45:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZD20-0003R7-Om for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:45:48 -0500 Received: from reservoir.hosting-cloud.net ([103.146.113.7]:44499) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZ8Bg-0007G1-0S for 61852@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 05:35:26 -0500 X-Mailborder-Info: host=console.hosting-cloud.net, gmt_time=1678098920, scan_time=9.04s X-Mailborder-Spam-Score: 1.8 X-Mailborder-Spam-X: xx X-Mailborder-Spam-Report: URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_05, SPF_FAIL, DKIM_SIGNED, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, MB_DMARC_FAIL, KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE, DKIM_INVALID, NICE_REPLY_A, Received: from cp61.hosting-cloud.net (unknown [103.119.110.239]) by smtp.hosting-cloud.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E2727FE2A; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 21:34:16 +1100 (AEDT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 9E2727FE2A Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=tailcall.au Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=whatson@tailcall.au DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 9E2727FE2A Authentication-Results: smtp.hosting-cloud.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tailcall.au header.i=@tailcall.au header.b="Oy8BS5g8"; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tailcall.au ; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References: Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NK0QAgUWjB1bL8CAEQMCmHNp5bpu6w7ML1HBqHEw4d4=; b=Oy8BS5g8G6tpLN0jJ4ziJM/8Dj Mah0W8BA6B03aj6ChKsWWFxriRH2jBMIJU5kkW0DE6knQ8qRT8XFUTAIUm/5qLttPSfMP6eHpxxeG FazhFD/7Lm9t4d8GiPeaxMCJPsZeCJKb/ESC2hglngW0Osd+SdcFqHyRpX4wZ2qlrPjmGEvfoqYHc oYWgsnNmr4T/BuYQAQ2J/Y22yHyIGo2FxTKXAFTfIrOYM5LURUUGpr+AbHa8fclO5RU8HiJA27Vcu zUwAe0+uxsZl+43HEvVDYokrQiLPjsHvb7Gk38lBTdHymZYmOOgwDYacDIiHbF61j5Mz/pVczjbTj Li5brLNA==; X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-From: whatson@tailcall.au X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.901, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, NICE_REPLY_A -0.00) X-HostingCloud-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-ID: 1pZ8AT-004L89-0G X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information Received: from eft1854679.lnk.telstra.net ([101.187.131.186] helo=[10.0.9.6]) by cp61.hosting-cloud.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pZ8AT-004L89-0G; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 21:34:09 +1100 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:34:07 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Content-Language: en-US References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@inria.fr> <878rgeyuz6.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <878rgeyuz6.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AuthUser: whatson@tailcall.au X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:45:42 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Andrew Whatson From: Andrew Whatson via Bug reports for GNU Guix Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-TUID: y684HquWcDKx Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Andrew Whatson skribis: > >> Comparing hex dumps of the files, there are significant differences, >> and a quick dive through the image dumping code leads into VM and >> garbage collector details which are over my head. >> >> I guess patching Scheme 48 to build deterministic images is >> out-of-scope and maybe an issue for upstream. > > Yes, probably! Would you mind reporting it upstream? No worries, I've emailed the Scheme 48 list about the issue. Cheers, Andrew