From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id Yg8BGwYQz2AlbwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 11:53:10 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id uCwyFgYQz2BBfgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:53:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CDE175EB for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 11:53:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58296 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luu8Z-0002R8-VJ for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 05:53:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luu8U-0002Qx-Pv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 05:53:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luu8U-0006x6-Ii for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 05:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luu8U-0004vn-Cf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 05:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#48729] [PATCH v5 24/25] gnu: Add bitmask. Resent-From: Raghav Gururajan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48729 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos , 48729@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Jorge Gomez Received: via spool by 48729-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48729.162418275418922 (code B ref 48729); Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:53:02 +0000 Received: (at 48729) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2021 09:52:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luu82-0004v7-4U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 05:52:34 -0400 Received: from out0.migadu.com ([94.23.1.103]:47767) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luu7v-0004ut-GI for 48729@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 05:52:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raghavgururajan.name; s=key1; t=1624182745; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=c+1F69Y+1N8abnO9BlrUNYkEcrj+dtrwb/iweRmXQZg=; b=CDKRF184bOwhdGmB2DV9iRMvLwgLMQ7TkMmf8fyLhMXfnK76dTonLd44uiiDb5EExTN9Cq uQ1VDNMlZsghKdl2xwMGlRs/lkio3Yi/7Ir5FRwNzMbtB1/mmaOig5RGH2u+Rl1ksOewzL pvcj69L2PaA5f9L/5WQevaAIOeZr8+9TjkBzA8yGGV5jYNbDn5Lur+Uu1nwr1A2EuTc1SR gjLJJW6ClbwvatqXnhiaZTiZvaiEyt5DLBM1UsBfXiC9xI75zcTJllCSuc6T9ufPoc6XjF mu3zhfJfaQ6wjN8lShKmgn5k8sTJYWWjwWsg45tco/oI1PYJcsvLlG9/iEAPbg== References: <20210618065416.22391-14-rg@raghavgururajan.name> <20210618065416.22391-24-rg@raghavgururajan.name> <9da322662c0eb0b552f9e2dbaebb8a71111754a2.camel@telenet.be> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 05:52:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9da322662c0eb0b552f9e2dbaebb8a71111754a2.camel@telenet.be> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h52seJKdGQiD98LCHThjnwJltvQpuZQtZ" X-Migadu-Auth-User: rg@raghavgururajan.name X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Raghav Gururajan X-ACL-Warn: , Raghav Gururajan via Guix-patches From: Raghav Gururajan via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1624182789; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=c+1F69Y+1N8abnO9BlrUNYkEcrj+dtrwb/iweRmXQZg=; b=Jq8zqz/amcq47ishwFoCupUmr2nFGV/lXCRPpcvFV2jEtNe8zEq98WLeyLlmW6Ba98i+Og hZrfNwqXqpE1eBiL55+PYLfYTzcRcqd0GSVZC+fP7BJRK4Eq5VvSwplFTrwukVRE9lO7Yv 2Gi7SOZMj5gpLlKTlWptulQ+B3U/eMPa83nhYkK3GIPewL61lQtbhWc1xX3zm046zeBoev FKZ32lNMsvjHvGbfm9R+LamPZmO2BzW6FJSZem1msBG+Sv51C/zDtcc/ykR+FMZyHY1Qny e0hiwjaRkvTPBfPqRDKy/tD+3AZF9naxTRtbMgcvMolpAIcugaxGWJpzUDYi7A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1624182789; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PgndoYvqFZRhgEotuFUui7RnC37JNcPgfJiD0LWvmrw9wvZiQ76+JDdWbNMDxFe/z/ncM+ EdijTzIEW3YomUho15rL84SGGqAyR44iDidhLO+JMmQsCgs4BrQgCoXXiPTBU3M0lleZq+ yHzzZz0BL3kWpgA301BjNj4RrlwdRM6wHMiF1hBNWaSQX8sC1d3s5M0Eak0Bapae4/G6EK JdjypgsPR4sVOtoWeEjWHWzq44fC5WWQjDLs53T037zQCp1Lty6pMZg9eCNXuDpVk67bSd CtkDXXirf2E93NOtiOEZ0PAswohmfWp5mNYbaVN+TUYdVf54UGSfPHNf3dePgA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=raghavgururajan.name header.s=key1 header.b=CDKRF184; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.03 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=raghavgururajan.name header.s=key1 header.b=CDKRF184; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 50CDE175EB X-Spam-Score: -5.03 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: MmcZlKDXkNLM This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --h52seJKdGQiD98LCHThjnwJltvQpuZQtZ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="tl1vBYYvkG2CL4jOzCm5eYOAIaZokn6sK"; protected-headers="v1" From: Raghav Gururajan To: Maxime Devos , 48729@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Jorge Gomez Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#48729] [PATCH v5 24/25] gnu: Add bitmask. References: <20210618065416.22391-14-rg@raghavgururajan.name> <20210618065416.22391-24-rg@raghavgururajan.name> <9da322662c0eb0b552f9e2dbaebb8a71111754a2.camel@telenet.be> In-Reply-To: <9da322662c0eb0b552f9e2dbaebb8a71111754a2.camel@telenet.be> --tl1vBYYvkG2CL4jOzCm5eYOAIaZokn6sK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Maxime! > Snippets can be G-expressions. Personally, I'd go with a G-expression > instead of an S-expression, because >=20 > * that makes it more obvious it is staged code, and not, say, SXML > * G-exps are cool [citation needed] >=20 >> + (build-system go-build-system) >> + (arguments [...]) I see. Would you be able to illustrate with a snippet please? I haven't=20 used G-exps much. > A bit large, but all the code there seems required > Seems ok, though not being able to build i18n files is a bit > unfortunate. Yeah. TypeScript shenanigans with the i18n. >> + (synopsis "White-label VPN client by LEAP") >=20 > About =E2=80=98White-label=E2=80=99: this seems an odd thing to say abo= ut software. > Here is a definition, in case we are talking about different things: >=20 > From Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWhite-lab= el_product&oldid=3D1028825641): >=20 > =E2=80=98A white-label product is a product or service produced by one = company (the producer) > that other companies (the marketers) rebrand to make it appear as if th= ey had made > it.[1][2] The name derives from the image of a white label on the packa= ging that can > be filled in with the marketer's trade dress. White label products are = sold by retailers > with their own trademark but the products themselves are manufactured b= y a third party.[3]=E2=80=99 >=20 > bitmask isn't a product or a service, it's just software. > It is also not sold. I don't see how =E2=80=98white-label=E2=80=99 can= apply to bitmask. >=20 > Also, I don't see what value adding "White-label" to the synopsis > provides to users(*). >=20 > (*) Here, =E2=80=98users=E2=80=99 are all people using Guix. Including = people hacking on Guix > (=E2=80=98developers=E2=80=99). >=20 > I'd drop "White-label" from the synopsis. I used white-label because bitmask is neither a service provider on its=20 own nor tied-to/developed-for specific provider. Whichever supported=20 provider is chosen the application name, icons, logo etc becomes that of = the provider. In other words, the app re-brands itself based on chosen=20 VPN provider. But I'll change the while-label to generic, in the synopsis. Regards, RG. --tl1vBYYvkG2CL4jOzCm5eYOAIaZokn6sK-- --h52seJKdGQiD98LCHThjnwJltvQpuZQtZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQTNLV6qqYzLN9qR1rBfWBZkf4vlUQUCYM8P1wUDAAAAAAAKCRBfWBZkf4vlUbit AQCBVfdB9q73kvICjQ6+NFJehGuO71YgLACuTWGpAqY9EQEAmgIQ4n8Qt3iMRPodMTvv5NSi7s7t uEZn/IRDkLPjFQs= =Qbix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h52seJKdGQiD98LCHThjnwJltvQpuZQtZ--