From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Woodcroft Subject: Re: Fwd: 16/35: gnu: r-ggplot2: Update to 2.2.0. Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:28:21 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20161229204925.E8B3B2201C9@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <9f559f47-67a2-8a58-79c3-df959d9ac30d@uq.edu.au> <87ziiiyx07.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVcnf-0007Ro-F8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 06:28:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVcna-0005E7-Mb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 06:28:39 -0500 Received: from mailhub2.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.209]:39990 helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVcna-0005DF-4C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 06:28:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ziiiyx07.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" On 23/01/17 18:57, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Ben Woodcroft writes: > >>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>> Subject: 16/35: gnu: r-ggplot2: Update to 2.2.0. >>> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC) >>> From: Ricardo Wurmus >>> Reply-To: Ricardo Wurmus >>> To: guix-commits@gnu.org >>> >>> >>> >>> rekado pushed a commit to branch master >>> in repository guix. >>> >>> commit ab01f1cdb11520f0d56249719bcf627cad802bc2 >>> Author: Ricardo Wurmus >>> Date: Thu Dec 29 20:51:26 2016 +0100 >>> >>> gnu: r-ggplot2: Update to 2.2.0. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-ggplot2): Update to 2.2.0. >>> [propagated-inputs]: Remove r-proto and r-svglite; add r-lazyev= al and >>> r-tibble. >> Is there are particular reason why svglite was removed from propagated= -inputs? In response I'm now unable to save SVG files with "ggsave", unle= ss I install r-svglite separately. >> >> Perhaps this is a consequence of the updater suggesting some inputs ca= n be removed? > It is. My apologies! > > =E2=80=9Cr-svglite=E2=80=9D is optional and was reported by my modified= updater, which > compares the current inputs with the inputs a fresh import would > suggest. If optional inputs are added it would be good to comment on > why they were added. I probably wouldn=E2=80=99t have removed them in = that > case. OK, np, pushed as e4b6c565beef27a1ce2203a9bc119e84a126e5e0. I wonder if the importer could import the previous version again and=20 compare to those, rather than just the current definition to avoid other=20 situations like this. ben