From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghav Gururajan Subject: bug#35586: GNOME Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 10:02:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190506075159.12C59308D7@disroot.org> <20190506090534.c3xzmapsdrqtc7ww@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-pZKrZPmqVlcf8JUER8MU" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNeCu-0002V6-3h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:03:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNeCs-00012V-Vh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:03:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNeCs-000129-BA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:03:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNeCs-0007dz-3W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:03:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190506090534.c3xzmapsdrqtc7ww@pelzflorian.localdomain> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: 35586@debbugs.gnu.org --=-pZKrZPmqVlcf8JUER8MU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Yeah! You could be right. On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:05 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" orian.de> wrote: > You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of) > Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same > goes for Nautilus. The terminal command is also still epiphany or > nautilus. > I do not know if it is possible to give a package two names; I > believe it is not. > I understand what you are saying. It appears epiphany is the old name > (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web). Dev must have used > epiphany now a days as a habit. > Also, the previous blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic > names. > > Maybe gnome-web could be the real package’s name and there could be > apackage called epiphany that propagates gnome-web, like the > gnomemeta-package does? Same for nautilus etc. > Regards,Florian > --=-pZKrZPmqVlcf8JUER8MU Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah! You could be right.

On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:05 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400,=
 Raghav Gururajan wrote:

On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> wrot=
e:

You can als=
o type both Epiphany and (your language=E2=80=99s translation of)

Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same <= /pre>

goes for Nautilus.  The terminal command is also still epiph=
any or

nautilus.

I do not know if it i=
s possible to give a package two names; I believe

it is not. 

I understand what you are saying. It appe=
ars epiphany is the old name (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web). Dev must have used=
 epiphany now a days as a habit.

Also, the previou=
s blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic names.


Maybe gnome-web could be the real package=
=E2=80=99s name and there could be a
package called epiphany that=
 propagates gnome-web, like the gnome
meta-package does?  Same fo=
r nautilus etc.

Regards,
Florian

--=-pZKrZPmqVlcf8JUER8MU--