From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: Heads-up: git.sv.gnu.org now rejects unsigned commits Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:00:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877fcart44.fsf@gnu.org> <483deee9-2d45-9da4-e79f-9e01643ea080@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRfUz-0004lA-Hb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:00:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRfUy-0000Zn-Rr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:00:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <483deee9-2d45-9da4-e79f-9e01643ea080@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Cyril Roelandt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Guix-devel Cyril, On 2016-07-25 12:02, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > What will we do about patches sent by casual contributors, that will > probably be unsigned? Should the committer sign them? Yes. (Most already do this, though.) Kind regards, T G-R -- Sent from a web browser. Excuse my brevity.