* [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey @ 2022-04-21 13:26 Paul Alesius 2022-04-21 14:25 ` Maxime Devos 2022-12-26 16:53 ` bug#55055: " Mathieu Othacehe 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Paul Alesius @ 2022-04-21 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 55055 [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 193 bytes --] The WireGuard configuration supports a PresharedKey attribute for additional security. This patch adds support for configuring a PresharedKey attribute. Tested, working. With regards, - Paul [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 292 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: guix.wg-psk.patch --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1744 bytes --] diff --git a/gnu/services/vpn.scm b/gnu/services/vpn.scm index b24e9cffb3..e3f5ff0d05 100644 --- a/gnu/services/vpn.scm +++ b/gnu/services/vpn.scm @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ (define-module (gnu services vpn) wireguard-peer-allowed-ips wireguard-peer-public-key wireguard-peer-keep-alive + wireguard-peer-preshared-key wireguard-configuration wireguard-configuration? @@ -701,6 +702,8 @@ (define-record-type* <wireguard-peer> (endpoint wireguard-peer-endpoint (default #f)) ;string (public-key wireguard-peer-public-key) ;string + (preshared-key wireguard-peer-preshared-key + (default #f)) ;string (allowed-ips wireguard-peer-allowed-ips) ;list of strings (keep-alive wireguard-peer-keep-alive (default #f))) ;integer @@ -727,16 +730,20 @@ (define (wireguard-configuration-file config) (define (peer->config peer) (let ((name (wireguard-peer-name peer)) (public-key (wireguard-peer-public-key peer)) + (preshared-key (wireguard-peer-preshared-key peer)) (endpoint (wireguard-peer-endpoint peer)) (allowed-ips (wireguard-peer-allowed-ips peer)) (keep-alive (wireguard-peer-keep-alive peer))) (format #f "[Peer] #~a PublicKey = ~a AllowedIPs = ~a -~a~a" +~a~a~a" name public-key (string-join allowed-ips ",") + (if preshared-key + (format #f "PresharedKey = ~a\n" preshared-key) + "") (if endpoint (format #f "Endpoint = ~a\n" endpoint) "") ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey 2022-04-21 13:26 [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey Paul Alesius @ 2022-04-21 14:25 ` Maxime Devos [not found] ` <CAL8jUGUyedoy+9va2qGJR5QpXn5B6cn7dWODyBJ0kxq1HQ+GYQ@mail.gmail.com> 2022-12-26 16:53 ` bug#55055: " Mathieu Othacehe 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Maxime Devos @ 2022-04-21 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Alesius, 55055 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1220 bytes --] Paul Alesius schreef op do 21-04-2022 om 15:26 [+0200]: > + (preshared-key wireguard-peer-preshared-key > + (default #f)) ;string This should be documented in the documentation, otherwise it will be difficult to discover. Also, #f is not a string, did you mean ‘;#f|string’? Also, a limitation: the preshared key will end up in the store, and hence be world-readable. So other users on the same system (other people or compromised system daemons) could now determine the preshared key. Questions: * Could the security limitation be documented? * What security impact does a leaked secret key have? * Does wireguard has some inclusion mechanism, such that the wireguard configuration can ‘include’ some file outside the store? * WDYT of verifying that the preshared key looks ‘reasonable’ (I guess only a-z0-9 characters, no spaces or newlines, not a bytevector ...) As-is, if I do (preshared-keys (string->utf8 "oops I thought this needs to be bytevector)) then "guix system reconfigure" doesn't give a nice error message, it will just silently produce a broken configuration file. Greetings, Maxime. [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAL8jUGUyedoy+9va2qGJR5QpXn5B6cn7dWODyBJ0kxq1HQ+GYQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* [bug#55055] Fwd: [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey [not found] ` <CAL8jUGUyedoy+9va2qGJR5QpXn5B6cn7dWODyBJ0kxq1HQ+GYQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2022-04-21 20:41 ` Paul Alesius 2022-04-21 21:55 ` Maxime Devos 2022-04-21 21:59 ` Maxime Devos 2022-04-21 21:48 ` Maxime Devos 1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Paul Alesius @ 2022-04-21 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 55055 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3075 bytes --] > Also, #f is not a string, did you mean ‘;#f|string’? The idea behind #f is that the field is optional, so that if it isn't specified in the configuration then it isn't written to the configuration file at all, hence #f is for a conditional when writing the actual configuration file and has no default value. > * Could the security limitation be documented? > * Does wireguard has some inclusion mechanism, such that the wireguard configuration can ‘include’ some file outside the store? I'll fix it properly to allow for loading of a key file, WireGuard does not have an inclusion mechanism. How does it work with regards to documentation and i18n versions, do you use online translation for the other languages? I can really only fill in the english version. > * What security impact does a leaked secret key have? Minimal to none, one should worry about the cloud peers over the wire guard pre-shared key. It's just an additional layer of security in case the public key algorithms are broken (for instance with quantum decryption), then the pre-shared key functions as a one-time pad. If none is specified, wireguard will use a default one of an all-zero string. Since countries log all traffic, you never know what they have, hence my patch submission. > * WDYT of verifying that the preshared key looks ‘reasonable’ (I guess only a-z0-9 characters, no spaces or newlines, not a bytevector ...) I could develop a subsystem for validating the fields of the wireguard but isn't it better to provide validations from the guix framework more broadly? With my level of Guile scripting right now, I doubt that it would be accepted. With regards, - Paul On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 at 16:26, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote: > Paul Alesius schreef op do 21-04-2022 om 15:26 [+0200]: > > + (preshared-key wireguard-peer-preshared-key > > + (default #f)) ;string > > This should be documented in the documentation, otherwise it will be > difficult to discover. Also, #f is not a string, did you mean > ‘;#f|string’? > > Also, a limitation: the preshared key will end up in the store, and > hence be world-readable. So other users on the same system (other > people or compromised system daemons) could now determine the preshared > key. > > Questions: > > * Could the security limitation be documented? > > * What security impact does a leaked secret key have? > > * Does wireguard has some inclusion mechanism, such that the > wireguard configuration can ‘include’ some file outside the store? > > * WDYT of verifying that the preshared key looks ‘reasonable’ > (I guess only a-z0-9 characters, no spaces or newlines, not a > bytevector ...) > > As-is, if I do (preshared-keys (string->utf8 "oops I thought this > needs to be bytevector)) then "guix system reconfigure" doesn't > give a nice error message, it will just silently produce a broken > configuration file. > > Greetings, > Maxime. > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3821 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [bug#55055] Fwd: [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey 2022-04-21 20:41 ` [bug#55055] Fwd: " Paul Alesius @ 2022-04-21 21:55 ` Maxime Devos 2022-04-21 21:59 ` Maxime Devos 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Maxime Devos @ 2022-04-21 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Alesius, 55055 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1082 bytes --] Paul Alesius schreef op do 21-04-2022 om 22:41 [+0200]: > > * WDYT of verifying that the preshared key looks ‘reasonable’ (I > > guess only a-z0-9 characters, no spaces or newlines, not a > > bytevector ...) > > I could develop a subsystem for validating the fields of the > wireguard but isn't it better to provide validations from the guix > framework more broadly? With my level of Guile scripting right now, I > doubt that it would be accepted. There's already a basic system for this: field sanitisers. Have a look at <network-address> and its 'assert-valid-address'. Long term, there were some ideas for a contract system à la racket, there was some e- mail thread about that. Also, some very basic validation could be replacing (format #f "PresharedKey = ~a\n" preshared-key) by (string-append "PresharedKey = " preshared-key "\n") -- basically, let string-append do some basic type checking. This only checks that it's a string though. 'make-regexp' and friends may be useful for more complete validation. Greetings, Maxime. [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [bug#55055] Fwd: [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey 2022-04-21 20:41 ` [bug#55055] Fwd: " Paul Alesius 2022-04-21 21:55 ` Maxime Devos @ 2022-04-21 21:59 ` Maxime Devos 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Maxime Devos @ 2022-04-21 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Alesius, 55055 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --] Paul Alesius schreef op do 21-04-2022 om 22:41 [+0200]: > > Also, #f is not a string, did you mean ‘;#f|string’? > > The idea behind #f is that the field is optional, so that if it isn't > specified in the configuration then it isn't written to the > configuration file at all, hence #f is for a conditional when writing > the actual configuration file and has no default value. It's optional in the generated wireguard configuration file, but not in the Guix record -- Guile records don't have a concept of optional fields, though there are fields with default values. Though apparently conventions are a bit inconsistent in Guix on this matter. wireguard-configuration just does ;string, but <agetty- configuration> does (define-record-type* <agetty-configuration> [...] (tty agetty-configuration-tty) ;string | #f (term agetty-term ;string | #f (default #f)) (baud-rate agetty-baud-rate ;string | #f (default #f)) (auto-login agetty-auto-login ;list of strings | #f (default #f)) [...] Greetings, Maxime. [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey [not found] ` <CAL8jUGUyedoy+9va2qGJR5QpXn5B6cn7dWODyBJ0kxq1HQ+GYQ@mail.gmail.com> 2022-04-21 20:41 ` [bug#55055] Fwd: " Paul Alesius @ 2022-04-21 21:48 ` Maxime Devos 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Maxime Devos @ 2022-04-21 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Alesius; +Cc: 55055 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 825 bytes --] Paul Alesius schreef op do 21-04-2022 om 22:30 [+0200]: > > * Does wireguard has some inclusion mechanism, such that the > > wireguard configuration can ‘include’ some file outside the store? > > I'll fix it properly to allow for loading of a key file, WireGuard > does not have an inclusion mechanism. How does it work with regards > to documentation and i18n versions, do you use online translation for > the other languages? I can really only fill in the english version. The main document is the English guix.texi, contributing.texi, ... Translation happens at <https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/guix/documentation-manual>. There is an automated system for making the translated guix.texi from the main guix.texi and the translations at translate.fedoraproject.org. Greetings, Maxime. [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#55055: [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey 2022-04-21 13:26 [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey Paul Alesius 2022-04-21 14:25 ` Maxime Devos @ 2022-12-26 16:53 ` Mathieu Othacehe 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Othacehe @ 2022-12-26 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Alesius; +Cc: 55055-done Hello Paul, > The WireGuard configuration supports a PresharedKey attribute for > additional security. This patch adds support for configuring a > PresharedKey attribute. I noticed this patchset after merging a more recent one, sorry about that. I think we can close this one though. Thanks, Mathieu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-26 16:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-04-21 13:26 [bug#55055] [PATCH] gnu: wireguard: Add support for PresharedKey Paul Alesius 2022-04-21 14:25 ` Maxime Devos [not found] ` <CAL8jUGUyedoy+9va2qGJR5QpXn5B6cn7dWODyBJ0kxq1HQ+GYQ@mail.gmail.com> 2022-04-21 20:41 ` [bug#55055] Fwd: " Paul Alesius 2022-04-21 21:55 ` Maxime Devos 2022-04-21 21:59 ` Maxime Devos 2022-04-21 21:48 ` Maxime Devos 2022-12-26 16:53 ` bug#55055: " Mathieu Othacehe
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.