From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Pimentel Subject: Re: [ART] Logo proposal Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:44:10 -0300 Message-ID: References: <1423405549.2120.7.camel@openmailbox.org> <87k2zqaf2g.fsf@gnu.org> <1423579572.2236.22.camel@openmailbox.org> <874mqsuoqi.fsf@gnu.org> <739777d03b8fe3cdd41cf023f867702e@openmailbox.org> <1423773334.4167.11.camel@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YM0cc-0001Jh-C7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:44:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YM0cX-0000AW-ID for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:44:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1423773334.4167.11.camel@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guix-devel-bounces+d4n1=opmbx.org@gnu.org On 2015-02-12 17:35, Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo wrote: > El jue, 12-02-2015 a las 08:55 -0300, Daniel Pimentel escribi=C3=B3: >> On 2015-02-11 18:23, ludo@gnu.org wrote: >> > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribi= s: >> > >> >> What worries me about staying close to the GNU branding is that it >> >> could >> >> create the confusion RMS wants to avoid (people thinking that GuixS= D >> >> is >> >> *the* GNU OS and GNU's head its logo). He even suggested having a l= ogo >> >> for Guix and GuixSD [1][2]. So I think it would be better to play i= t >> >> safe and avoid any conflict within the GNU Project. We can still >> >> emphasise the close relationship between GuixSD and the GNU Project= , >> >> and >> >> hence the proposal of a wildebeest head as the logo for GuixSD too. >> > >> > Yes, makes sense. >> > >> > So, let=E2=80=99s use this GuixSD logo! >> > >> > To begin with, I think we could use it in the GRUB and/or SLiM >> > backgrounds. WDYT? >> > >> > Then we=E2=80=99ll want to use it on the web site somehow, but the c= urrent >> > =E2=80=9Csite=E2=80=9D is really just one page, and it would seem od= d to have the two >> > logos upfront on the same page. >> > >> > Thus, the first step would be to come up with a multi-page site (yay= !) >> > and with appropriate style. That probably means departing from the >> > gnu.org style sheets and server-side includes. This is not an ideal >> > solution, but it easier than trying to adjust all of gnu.org to meet >> > our >> > needs. I would hope that whoever takes up this task communicates wi= th >> > the gnu.org webmasters in an effort to collaborate in the longer run= . >> > >> > Thoughts? Volunteers? >> > >> > Lastly, I=E2=80=99m not sure what to do about the main Guix logo. O= n one hand >> > I >> > like the one you propose, but on the other I=E2=80=99m a bit relucta= nt to >> > change. >> > >> > Thanks again! >> > >> > Ludo=E2=80=99. >> I like Guix logo (I did sticker and paste in my computers :) and I=20 >> think >> that should not change, but maybe to GuixSD could change or not. I=20 >> like >> for idea to universal Guix logo to "package manager" and "OS". What do >> you think about name GuixOS? >>=20 >> Thanks, >=20 > If GuixSD is the final name for the distro, I attached a logo to=20 > replace > the one currently used on the List of Free GNU/Linux Distributions. If > not, tell me and I'll make any necessary changes. I like it, simple, representative and beautiful. --=20 Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)