all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@edu.uni-graz.at>
To: <42688@debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: bug#42688: Running a script with `guix repl` doesn't "see" additional channels using (%package-module-path)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:16:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd34fe61016d7c2d9e7f9f0043927f94760f52b9.camel@edu.uni-graz.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200803043331.78b20336@runbox.com>

Hi Guix,

I've finally figured out, what causes this issue.

Guix repl uses the following code to call scripts:
```
    (unless (null? script)
      ;; Run script
      (save-module-excursion
       (lambda ()
         (set-program-arguments script)
         (set-user-module)
         (load-in-vicinity "." (car script)))))
```

But `guix describe` (which is used to initialize %package-module-path)
has the following:

```
(define current-profile
  (mlambda ()
    "Return the profile (created by 'guix pull') the calling process
lives in,
or #f if this is not applicable."
    (match (command-line)
      ((program . _)
       (and (string-suffix? "/bin/guix" program)
           [...])))))

(define current-profile-entries [...])
(define current-channel-entries [...])
(define package-path-entries [...])
```

Each of these procedures depends on the previous, building up a chain
that fails exactly in the case where we (set-program-arguments [...])
with a script other than the current channel's guix (which is probably
the way you'd want to use `guix repl`).  

There are some ways of resolving this.  One would be to access earlier
versions of "command-line" – it does resolve to a fluid, but that fluid
itself is not exposed to Guile.  Perhaps there might be some FFI magic
to access it.

You could also set up your script to fake being a Guix command by
setting the command line to be (cons*
"$HOME/.config/guix/current/bin/guix" "repl" (command-line)), i.e.
reconstructing the way your script has been invoked.  This would
obviously break if you were to call it with a different Guix, also
you'd have to resolve $HOME instead of writing it like that, but you'd
have access to your channels.

On the other hand, we could patch `guix repl` to initialize %package-
module-path earlier (still leaving `guix describe` broken) or somehow
try to work around that issue in `guix describe`.

Regards,
Leo





  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-16 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-03  3:33 bug#42688: Running a script with `guix repl` doesn't "see" additional channels using (%package-module-path) pkill9
2020-09-16 14:15 ` zimoun
2020-09-16 15:16 ` Leo Prikler [this message]
2020-09-17 15:31   ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-09-17 16:15     ` Leo Prikler
2020-09-17 19:10       ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-09-17 19:56         ` Leo Prikler
2020-09-19 21:03           ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd34fe61016d7c2d9e7f9f0043927f94760f52b9.camel@edu.uni-graz.at \
    --to=leo.prikler@edu.uni-graz.at \
    --cc=42688@debbugs.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.