From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: packaging - sentences in description Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:42:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k1gwtfo5.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5tSr-0000Uo-M4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:42:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5tSq-0004ZT-T1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:42:09 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:42220) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5tSq-0004Ug-At for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:42:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k1gwtfo5.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Giovanni Biscuolo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Le 2019-03-18 15:34, Giovanni Biscuolo a écrit : > Hi Guix > > I'm packaging go-github-com-burntsushi-locker, this is the package > definition: > > [...] > > (home-page "https://github.com/BurntSushi/locker") > (synopsis "Manage named ReadWrite mutexes in Go") > (description "Golang package for conveniently using named > read/write > locks. These appear to be especially useful for synchronizing access to ^ here > session based information in web applications. > > The common use case is to use the package level functions, which use a > package > level set of locks (safe to use from multiple goroutines > simultaneously). However, you may also create a new separate set of > locks ^ here > test. > > All locks are implemented with read-write mutexes. To use them like a > regular ^ and here > mutex, simply ignore the RLock/RUnlock functions.") > (license license:public-domain)))) > I think that's all. HTH :)