From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Anyone using libhilbert? Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:13:03 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmlux-0004EU-RN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:11:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmluw-0001ka-Om for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:11:19 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:cc92::1]:35318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmluw-0001jq-DX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:11:18 -0400 Content-Language: en-GB List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org, bavier@member.fsf.org Guix, Eric, The sources[0] for our[1] libhilbert package have been missing from the Web for a while. At least since March[2]. It's not the easiest package or author to track down, and I lost interest after a while since I'm not really familiar with either. Is anyone still using this (leaf) package? Does anyone have a back-up copy of the sources in their store, in case someone is? Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://web.cs.dal.ca/~chamilto/hilbert/libhilbert-0.2-1.tar.gz [1]: distinct from https://github.com/aipescience/libhilbert, AFAICT [2]: https://github.com/atoader/HilbertRTree/issues/2