From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iHAcGApOyl8CSQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:56:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 0DYSFApOyl9sUgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:56:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF23D9404DF for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58032 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klCVE-0001sa-8x for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:56:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klCTC-0000rZ-1x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:54:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klCTB-0005hM-PT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:54:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klCTB-0007vt-Nb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:54:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44999: guix deploy Error reading from the channel Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44999 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 44999-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44999.160709361230455 (code B ref 44999); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 44999) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 14:53:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43466 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klCSi-0007v9-Jn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:53:32 -0500 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:29611) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klCSf-0007uu-Sw for 44999@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:53:31 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 83.118.200.115 Received: from elite (unknown [83.118.200.115]) (Authenticated sender: jeremy@korwin-zmijowski.fr) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10A6124000C; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:53:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <871rg6et2y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <046761441ee840be6d6bd4c9defe10291eee687d.camel@korwin-zmijowski.fr> <871rg6et2y.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:55:54 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44999@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.29 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DF23D9404DF X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: WQnhnIgHQ31w Le jeudi 03 décembre 2020 à 17:45 +0100, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > Does it fail like this every time? > > Your message suggests deployment on the droplet eventually succeeded > since you were able to run ‘guix pull’ there, is that correct? > > Thanks, > Ludo’. Hello Ludo ! I made some more attempts. I was unable to reproduce the previous scenario… Looks like with my ssh connections I put myself in an exceptionnal situation. All I got is `guix deploy` running forever (I let it more than 2 hours) $ guix deploy ynm-droplet-declaration.scm La (1) machine suivante sera déployée : ynm1607086083 guix deploy: déploiement vers ynm1607086083... I have to kill it myself. There is no guix on the target system. As soon as I get some time I will try to determine where it stops. Jérémy