From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: 04/48: gnu: ruby-redcarpet: Update to 3.4.0. Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:55:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170810222103.27496.54045@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170810222104.9016524C52@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lgm3gj6o.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dme9c-000404-Of for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:53:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dme9b-0006K6-LP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:53:56 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:cc92::1]:36020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dme9b-0006Jt-AQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:53:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lgm3gj6o.fsf@netris.org> Content-Language: en-GB List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: mhw@netris.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark, Mark H Weaver wrote on 29/08/17 at 05:13: > Before this commit, ruby-redcarpet (3.3.3) successfully built on all > three hydra-supported-systems: x86_64, i686, and armhf: > > https://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/master/ruby-redcarpet-3.3.3.i686-linux > https://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/master/ruby-redcarpet-3.3.3.armhf-linux > > Since this commit, we've never built it successfully on i686 or armhf: > > https://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/master/ruby-redcarpet-3.4.0.i686-linux > https://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/master/ruby-redcarpet-3.4.0.armhf-linux > > Would you be willing to investigate? Sure. The same two tests fail on both architectures (HTMLRenderTest and HTMLTOCRenderTest), but not on x86_64. I'll investigate why. In the worst case we could just disable them. Kind regards, T G-R