From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id qINHD1Ng9GXtfAEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:50:59 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id qINHD1Ng9GXtfAEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:50:59 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-science-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-science-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=cnrs.fr (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1710514259; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=cpyBKN/HWbY4y81Lf3ex+IjSbRhb2KHtELH3a8JwDfM=; b=lrQWbNMtxdJsmssBKPPheIAdYdzrYUMlt/oZgyJAzN77Z07Yi01KIdac29daVzioRxqEBw yXtyRlUXEtugrF1Cth4UXdazZNoOaiNOsLlxuG/7aXnBY2fPXPuzLWMgSdx+s/LWla+2rM TRIzvVVe8t7tioYqIK+f0MccwfIhJD8WPE10xejEja7uL5dXI5gTGCly5ur8jb3XsAEBlK c2jO0DCmhM+WOzUo9t6FOmFxhuClz2qJ92bbQQdGiwF4/Cdt/m7AsB+SoZ1vvsf8PsX9qv IUUNyoNIiuqsCMBsPyerTYzUmB3iwDUD/ddl8FFZ+xPgHwpIX6KAD/T7Yqi5Bw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1710514259; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=LHuMWeE61vMvZOmXl+HLkYHy5Gxme0eg2bOV0FgwsLrNjWRGALDmuvVsmKgMtNPnVBps4C KQoPTyzWfp/AZJCmdbdm3mpZHnbCqMPXyaW3xaBq/dTHbL8zgRFkfPme76XjhvMdLlKcT3 iXVTg+6BaUyPzOFelWrqu1xCml816VdImGsW5wKfE0CWoS/ZVIZnA3eEODW+b7vyzlze5t kpo1r4gRtlU0TGRsp5BUufDXrsUXI+rXWKLX/LsWeMYDTPzHPIgGAANMg1erP/rew6Zt7y HGLL18405OZTREt4B1fZTf9aKbBGf8Na1gZ/FwgDa4A/jfzxX3qDfOX/Fl3PkQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-science-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-science-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=cnrs.fr (policy=none) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C11316EC1E for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:50:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl8tH-0003uv-7y; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:50:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl8tE-0003tu-Fp for guix-science@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:50:32 -0400 Received: from cczrelay05.in2p3.fr ([134.158.66.155] helo=cczrelay01.in2p3.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl8t5-0004FP-CY for guix-science@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:50:32 -0400 Received: from [193.48.89.201] (sbgat392.in2p3.fr [193.48.89.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by cczrelay01.in2p3.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 42FEoIlO031378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:50:18 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:50:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Problem with guix copy Content-Language: en-US To: guix-science@gnu.org References: <8fd0feda-7b79-40e2-8efd-39397e73ed38@iphc.cnrs.fr> <6803db02-00c9-4fbd-8cae-7b5985e2d1f6@iphc.cnrs.fr> From: Emmanuel Medernach In-Reply-To: <6803db02-00c9-4fbd-8cae-7b5985e2d1f6@iphc.cnrs.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=134.158.66.155; envelope-from=Emmanuel.Medernach@iphc.cnrs.fr; helo=cczrelay01.in2p3.fr X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-science@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-science-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-science-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.19 X-Spam-Score: -6.19 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C11316EC1E X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: QrK/voZUqwZa Le 15/03/2024 à 15:37, Emmanuel Medernach a écrit : > > Le 15/03/2024 à 15:10, Andreas Enge a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Am Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 02:58:23PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Medernach: >>> Now on both machines guix and guix-daemon used are the same, here >>> are both >>> paths: >>> /gnu/store/m79ld7h62wjbx6kc2jip73lmh8lfc8qs-guix-command >>> /gnu/store/z642sncd5jgj4bc3p18rdqwdkq30p833-guix-daemon >>> When I try a guix copy the requested hash is still different from >>> the one on >>> Machine_A (and it wishes to recompile it): >> just a wild guess, but could it be that you did a "guix gc" on Machine A >> and that there are grafts in play? In that case the ungrafted package >> may >> have been deleted, and will then be recomputed. >> >> Maybe you could try the same operation adding --no-grafts to the >> command. > > Thanks for your idea, here is the result: > > Machine_A # guix package --manifest="$HOME"/manifests/bazel.scm > --no-grafts --no-substitutes > Machine_A # guix package --list-installed | grep bazel > bazel           6.4.0   out > /gnu/store/8xmcsk5jrkxb06whgj0fif0mrxvhyvj6-bazel-6.4.0 > > The hash has changed but is still not the one requested by Machine_B > with guix copy (same message there) > > I cannot publish from Machine_A to Machine_B (but I don't know if that > would be better or not) > Ok for the time being I give up and will compile bazel on Machine_B, but I am curious why the hash requested from Machine_B is not the one built on Machine_A ? The problem is that I will have many machines like Machine_B and I would like to avoid recompilation of packages on all of them if possible. Emmanuel