From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id AJtBHuwCHGaYGQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:23:08 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id AJtBHuwCHGaYGQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:23:08 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=s9mDNUFL; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1713111788; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=FcchRGnOpTXwtlKe2s5mJ1sTXwgbX49hsPHWDPOgZQg=; b=f2OV9JqbesuBz9mUzLKOpfxczZY1+Vc3QID/82UmWQNnbZ41zw/5/SUmDa0MTiXuWLfuC8 nCpPSoPCSyRqqbZ7GroxU/6x1qnO0yIsCcc9SBVK1dyI6w8JZJioJ4n79b73vy1tK89q/D DoQkaHwuGUIHQiHguwHeCruwpdKqe156rhnQv29zfbgE/Z5BAWwaXsl54NOv4FRItuB785 /1y/yrzXV3jpOi4/FwAt11gAsNJlu6Km2lAM2h0NF6soaB5ORCBEwetDy9qS9RnHV/8D+U MU4n4pqMQ4q6luZNS5EHjg6xaTOQrJgbBlYZAShLqNZf3U6xbIpSZjpguSBMKA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1713111788; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YSe/d5eDNOmivZcuPch9quD6k/G96NMNtsFeaULVcd5qFLouqKQt6ltiZh6ixcMAVnyEL6 xGn6HzpclVmxy5VEaDqS4sSDiHlLnU66FJdsSGJGEGDsRJaidjeU4CdI40CMy1n7D2hkgW O9i1PGFFAyN03gGaXC4lwJHb4egkze+yf3qjyGLnc7S5cak+Z68ypTueQADtYbU5wKvJK8 dU4ADs616q++bV19ycAba9yJzIduictQhIfoKOSc1JKhyHt9ajHBCol7zSLcpuY0yFd6HK bAHSXwk+UXQZMf0EQtzH25Hpfo8eYc5cOmn9/bKAoJqO4JHGWFBAnB5x0GSLUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=s9mDNUFL; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60DCD33811 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:23:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2cp-0004IY-Aw; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:22:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2cl-0004II-DH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:22:36 -0400 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw2cj-00068z-FY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:22:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1713111743; x=1713370943; bh=FcchRGnOpTXwtlKe2s5mJ1sTXwgbX49hsPHWDPOgZQg=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=s9mDNUFLwu63lF7sbTjFijMR5vTPHPPoqPdtUf0TMPJE4hDNhUSQy3QSKXAMQWxGo 89yAc4uXaPIBlA/EeOeHYCM5pmetdBQFlz5RdSDCrq9tgVUndcY1bc1u1ciJVjYAsQ AYkosFRkGs7gBjB8sSvNRMF4MxNMwnqAGDdXF5UTAR1ArXzT7G7LHlzw9RYpQnciLo nyhnUAXL5h9RaOIG95QH+QIwfcf3g2viuLH1GjR7QI5DXJRceN+YuLNCdc+A5mRXuZ eCMJyJmlgvKFM+ZiuGBcwfFZIsARQQrao5KYjLT1a0aWmW65ru5BNbg82S9ntwTI89 2smgyoxyq4QYQ== Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:22:19 +0000 To: Giovanni Biscuolo From: Skyler Ferris Cc: Guix Devel Subject: Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87le5hig56.fsf@xelera.eu> References: <87ttkon4c4.fsf@protonmail.com> <6e743725-26f0-669c-b088-e56c850110c8@elenq.tech> <87wmp5l3r3.fsf@gnu.org> <8076578a-bebd-0f26-6d39-f634ded290ce@elenq.tech> <87y19hiwng.fsf@xelera.eu> <1c6f4d74-fad5-49ad-b29e-2b02c2418c10@protonmail.com> <87le5hig56.fsf@xelera.eu> Feedback-ID: 40635331:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.22; envelope-from=skyvine@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4322.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.80 X-Spam-Score: -6.80 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 60DCD33811 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: dS02GOiGh0vX On 4/13/24 05:47, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > Hello Skyler, > > Skyler Ferris writes: > >> On 4/12/24 23:50, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: >>> general reminder: please remember the specific scope of this (sub)threa= d > [...] > >>> (https://yhetil.org/guix/8734s1mn5p.fsf@xelera.eu/) >>> >>> ...and if needed read that message again to understand the context, >>> please. >>> >> I assume that this was an indirect response to the email I sent >> previously where I discussed the problems with PGP signatures on release >> files. > No, believe me! I'm sorry I gave you this impression. :-) > >> I believe that this was in scope > To be clear: not only I did not mean to say - even indirectly - that you > where out of scope _or_ that you did not understand the context. > > Also, I really did not mean to /appear/ as the "coordinator" of this > (sub)thread and even less to /appear/ as the one who decides what's in > scope and what's OT; obviously everyone is absolutely free to decide > what is in scope and that she or he understood the context . > >> because of the discussion about whether to use VCS checkouts which >> lack signatures or release tarballs which have signatures. > I still have not commented what you discussed just because I lack time, > not interest; if I can I'll do it ASAP=E2=84=A2 :-( > > [...] > > Thanks! Gio' > Thanks for clarifying! Misunderstandings happen sometimes. I look=20 forward to hearing=C2=A0 your thoughts if you're able to find time to share= =20 them! =3D)