From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id WPglDK4PkWCUiAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 11:11:10 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id wPm2B64PkWBGQQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 09:11:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE0EE165 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41224 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldr5A-0001cp-RB for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:11:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldr55-0001Zo-ES for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:11:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldr55-0007I9-4r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:11:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldr55-0004nS-0e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:11:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#47769] [bug#45558] [PATCH] Add js_of_ocaml Resent-From: divoplade Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 09:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47769 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: pukkamustard Cc: 45558@debbugs.gnu.org, 47769@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 45558@debbugs.gnu.org, 47769@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by 47769-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47769.162011943518411 (code B ref 47769); Tue, 04 May 2021 09:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 47769) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 09:10:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldr4d-0004mn-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:10:35 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:57499) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldr4b-0004mN-4E; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:10:33 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 86.233.159.27 Received: from pruneau.home (lfbn-poi-1-196-27.w86-233.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.233.159.27]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7772F20006; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: divoplade Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 11:10:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86im3z9gdd.fsf@posteo.net> References: <559a908f91e39af40a1580447a708209785c69b8.camel@divoplade.fr> <86im3z9gdd.fsf@posteo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1620119470; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=mAQ+5NhrdDFMOYW50neQrnkU/L4RSmwRcaIP/Atxsrg=; b=BaBQJw/QqKPNFi163yXOOCrP0OZ5WykpHisIFj+sOXiFtE1YZ3TAvXuxcvNsWq7T8/2WHv QyiLahkacqCGt8xrQuI6uudQlc/ZH54yZzUge7Rh9S6EeULsMp4+PJvghYqN1ct5u2FRo0 fz8cgId+ANzMcSNvQQDugIH10yxu+HtLkuUrfR8YwbK1rlMKE2G5dWO/64PpD0TCn+KKkV dTM/GyJLaCnR7cOLovjzn7FDWAJuW3Zngh5UenHhkLpJMfmgu6e6A2O1BZ9/PZsDXz5T1E aUcDF5pnhObj1oVNKTgekiurGu39yL+2/5xWel5BhZThLFX2tkl46JiVdzup9Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1620119470; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IB1Rno7Gw7wdIiQMjvR3M++oGLbsYav48+h28FG+BImh5LHSea/PqmbqmmZ+Jw6+Rdoq4k 4Hu8722jZtCTUXjI/Z3+25pg1SlHZKRMQasoMssDP3OEIDPVmUov7Dvjx8l1eYrmLzy6+q VwMltnR6ws0C+S5m69bvBY2+eEKfzTuO8rh6jMimZi2Y/o4vucBzXbSGkztGK+JOKA/X8f 62xmuVFpi3BMOanuIYFvtBfly05LLOfi1sBmfgxJJ/7vOmREd52t1EJAhyCzYEvQCQG+U1 E8QtCIEIWtmz+mhiXY02XPjv3bTC+W17irSJ0tK9o4cHCC2rGPLm4H82JWn9xQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.46 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DCE0EE165 X-Spam-Score: -2.46 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: pG6HFbRWUMbx Hello, Thank you for the interest in this issue. I realize I opened it at a rather inconvenient time, so I guess it ended up on the bottom of the pile for quite some time. Le lundi 03 mai 2021 à 12:38 +0000, pukkamustard a écrit : > I submitted a series of patches that does this for many OCaml > packages including the ones included in your series > (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47768). The situation is quite complex to me, please bear with me. If I understand correctly, you pushed a lot of ocaml updates last month, making some of the changes I made in december somewhat obsolete. Right? So, now, I should your modified 5 patches in this issue on top of the 37 patches in the other issue to get js-of-ocaml. Is it correct? At this rate, if it is possible, maybe you could just append these 5 to the other issue, it would be easier to track. What do you think? I didn’t detect indentation problems by running ./etc/indent-code.el; even if other packages in the module have some indentation problems.