From: L p R n d n <guix@lprndn.info>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Communication and Design at Guix
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 17:24:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cuc4la7i76m.fsf@lprndn.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eabfca8e-4db3-387c-c6a9-e9eead38ef47@riseup.net> (swedebugia's message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:08:11 +0100")
Hello,
swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net> writes:
> On 2019-01-17 12:10, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> L p R n d n <guix@lprndn.info> writes:
>>
>>> Guix is ...
>>>
>>> ... a package and system manager. (A seen previously, system manager is
>>> too wide)
>>> ... a package manager and machine administrator.
>>> ... a package and machine administrator.
>>> ... a package and environment manager.
>>>
>>> WDYT? If anyone has an idea, don't be shy :)
>>
>> “administrator” is generally understood to be a person (as in “system
>> administrator”). “environment manager” is just as vague as “system
>> manager”, in my opinion — “everything is the environment!”. It only
>> makes sense to people who are already familiar with the term
>> “environment” in a computing context.
>>
>> That’s the advantage the word “package manager” has — it’s already a
>> well-established term, for better or worse.
>>
>>> I'd like to keep the "package manager" part as it'll probably ring a
>>> bell to any linux user and helps understand the not so familiar part
>>> (system/environment dealing).
>>
>> Right, that’s what I meant.
>> We are underselling Guix, though, if we keep referring to it as a
>> “package manager”, because people’s familiarity with other package
>> managers may make them think in smaller terms.
>>
>> FWIW, I’m with Ludo here with regards to “Guix” as the “single brand”.
>> I disagree with this part that George wrote:
>>
>>> "Guix System" is a "bad" name for "GuixSD." Why? Because a new user's
>>> first expectation is for "Guix system" to refer to the whole of Guix,
>>> which we want to call "Guix" (referred to as "Guix Brand" below).
>>
>> In my experience “… system” is not generally used to describe a tool’s
>> full set of features. I think “Guix System” is just the right term for
>> everything that Guix generates or operates on with the “guix system” set
>> of commands. “GuixOS” is, in my opinion, a pretty terrible name (I’m
>> also not a fan of all the other “…OS” names out there) and it needlessly
>> keeps the confusion between “Guix, the tool” and “Guix, the system”
>> alive.
>
> Interesting.
>
> So if we go with "Guix System" would the following sentences be meaningful?
>
> "Is your operating system running Guix?" (ambiguous)
>
> "Which operating system do you use? Guix System."
> "Are you on Guix System?"
> "Which version of Guix System are you using?" (we should really have something
> like lsb_release -a output this term)
> "How did you install your Guix System?"
> "Can I dual-boot Guix System and Parabola GNU/Linux?"
>
> "A: My Guix System runs Linux. B: Oh, I use the Hurd on mine!"
I like this.
I would go a little further in terms of branding. If we go with this, I
think speaking of "a Guix system" instead of "the Guix System" (if it's
a noun, it's a brand so we would end up with the same problem that we
have with GuixSD).
"a Guix system" aknowledge the fact that Guix is almost a "system
builder" (VMs, containers, computers, clusters?).
I know Ludovic wasn't fond of "system" but we could replace the word
with anything else if someone find something more appropriate.
Plus, I had sone thoughts about how Guix doesn't fit really well within
the usual "linux distribution" definition. (I think it's unfortunately disadvantaging Guix in reviews, for example.)
I find that speaking of Guix in those terms, even if it doesn't explain
anything, at least gives some hints. I mean, at some point, changing of
channel can almost be like changing distro...
> "I love the R.M. Stallman picture that is on my Guix System during boot!" :D
> (https://wallup.net/wallpapers/richard-stallman/)
>
> "My Guix System performs really well"
> "Since I switched my operating system to Guix System I have not looked back"
> "I love my Guix System!"
> "Guix helps me get things done instead of losing myself in the details of
> dependencies and stuff when coding"
> "Guix makes it easy for me to sandbox my browser so I can surf without worrying
> too much"
> "Guix System boots a little slower than XX but it is worth the wait!"
> "I really like the roll-back provided by Guix System when I end up in a broken
> state" (geek version)
> "I really like the roll-back provided by Guix System when my pc won't boot and
> just goes black so I can't use the mouse or log in." (non-geek version)
> "I recommend Guix System because it makes it easy to copy your friends OS setup
> so that you can get to all the fun parts quickly without worrying about
> installing this or that - everything is there out-of-the-box!".
>
> If not please comment.
Have a nice day,
Lprndn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-08 16:49 Communication and Design at Guix L p R n d n
2019-01-08 17:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-01-09 6:11 ` swedebugia
2019-01-09 21:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-01-10 12:09 ` L p R n d n
2019-01-10 13:20 ` swedebugia
2019-01-10 14:34 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-01-13 21:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-01-14 15:02 ` L p R n d n
2019-01-15 10:36 ` zimoun
2019-01-15 18:03 ` nly
2019-01-15 22:08 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-01-16 11:00 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-01-15 22:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-01-14 23:25 ` swedebugia
2019-01-15 13:56 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-01-15 17:39 ` Julien Lepiller
2019-01-15 22:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-01-10 12:17 ` L p R n d n
2019-01-10 12:57 ` L p R n d n
2019-01-10 14:30 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-01-13 21:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-01-14 14:36 ` L p R n d n
2019-01-15 22:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-01-16 16:31 ` George Clemmer
2019-01-17 0:10 ` swedebugia
2019-01-17 10:58 ` L p R n d n
2019-01-17 11:10 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-01-17 14:08 ` swedebugia
2019-01-17 16:24 ` L p R n d n [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cuc4la7i76m.fsf@lprndn.info \
--to=guix@lprndn.info \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.