From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Isaac Subject: Re: should auto updaters be disabled? Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:14:19 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1582744536.983.0@riseup.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7ikf-0002p5-3v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:44:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7ikd-0005ZX-6I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:44:36 -0500 Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]:46120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7ikc-0005VG-0a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:44:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1582744536.983.0@riseup.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: raingloom , guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I agree that auto updaters should be disabled where applicable. But, ideally, like you said, this should be implemented upstream as a configuration option we can set at build time. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAl5ZQ2MACgkQLiXui2GA K7PW2QgAuLXO8ATeEXh7CQjAaZroy40Ku6pAnVxxocJnIDZtxzq8RKgavEx8jX6e doF4kS/F4lmXYQXOhiG16KRM8DTbsaMZaHUOFM1AYdZ/DQtplzrIH1QRxdu4akHk cS+70eR6QSMhF56VbqAG4ZdlIQuld+bUn4fe0+CMbpJrcQWGAhx95zsLAWmvxSgg +RgY6i/yf//T974TRcmQlPNYmX4X8MZ92o9OfRkqYviYKT9ORmG6j/ybG5AoRcHm HiVOGGsbte97qq8z+e/0BKw146yxmP2lVZsRyYdyioKtgma1Ef6EXThgzv+evYze 6SeNg+wzLgX4zHr14Di+QCgYexm92A== =GeMJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--