From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59153) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3QI8-00037k-NH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:08:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Q2o-0006Qh-CY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:53:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Q2o-0006Pq-94 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Q2n-00087f-UI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:53:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#28128] [PATCH] scripts: system: Add support for container network sharing. Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <87mum23aue.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170817191334.26269-1-mail@cbaines.net> <87h8cisqs8.fsf@gnu.org> <87mum23aue.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:22:03 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 28128@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Perhaps =E2=80=98essential-services=E2=80=99 could check whether > =E2=80=98hosts-database-service-type=E2=80=99 is part of the > =E2=80=98operating-system-user-services=E2=80=99. > > If it is, it would extend it; if not, it would do nothing. > > =E2=80=98hosts-database-service-type=E2=80=99 would be part of =E2=80=98%= base-services=E2=80=99, but > in the container-with-shared-network case, we=E2=80=99d remove it (in a > procedure similar to =E2=80=98virtualized-operating-system=E2=80=99.) > > How does that sound? This sounds workable. I'll send you an implementation soon. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAlyGrlMACgkQLiXui2GA K7OrLggAm5cuHSBpNG+JXUzQmpMnUfjAmH3JL51YRGHmWY4vPoUVwWUZFe6y0hoI AjhdO5Wh7Pb4s+U/FqCcmbykn/+PSL9iC+FpRh5tpxKsN/ZHJ6IJcZruNzti6y3e hjdSUiB3a6AO/3RSFSh/dw751aPIlnMdH+i+tHczgZPFi2shTDqtpL9PDsZEVJo8 tAjyzB+8fxNuIDwG8e+tDZfWhoTxQav4Ju/v4zRiMOtqG3lSqv3GIBolDt9fRAwn 6x+ToqOtCKJ0/IqV6tW2MelBYqwiMRtBJbr2r8c/O9a/smrvZ/0GR3XaYdrt7GmV 9FgzOSs0PR3B9up82wv47l28yKWy5Q== =OyVU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--