From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejl5b-0008CK-Pi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 07:14:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejl5W-0001rd-R9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 07:14:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejl5W-0001rN-NO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 07:14:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ejl5W-000571-9n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 07:14:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30196] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: services: Add wesnothd service. Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <87372e6t6s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180121183348.29317-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20180122121104.11149-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87372e6t6s.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:42:38 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30196@debbugs.gnu.org >> * gnu/services/games.scm: New file. >> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it. >> * doc/guix.texi (Game Services): Document the service. > > LGTM, thanks! Thanks, I'll push with the changes you mentioned. > You=E2=80=99d get bonus points by writing a system test, but perhaps ther= e=E2=80=99s not > much that could easily be tested. So, no big deal. I might be able to write a simple test that checks if the server has started successfully and is listening on port 15000. But, this seems too trivial a test to me. Is it worth it? WDYT?