[PATCH 0/1] Fix incorrect example package recipe in docs.

[PATCH 0/1] Fix incorrect example package recipe in docs.

[Ian Denhardt]

I was working off of this example from the manual when trying to
package feh this afternoon, but the example had a mistake. Thanks to
the folks on irc who helped me work this out (and a number of other
issues I was having).

Ian Denhardt (1):
  Fix incorrect example package recipe in docs.

 doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.1.1

[PATCH 1/1] Fix incorrect example package recipe in docs.

[Ian Denhardt]

In the section of the manual that first explains how to write a package
recipe, the example didn't work. The fix is trivial, just use
define-public instead of define.
---
 doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index f73ce52..813c133 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ package looks like this:
   #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
   #:use-module (guix licenses))
 
-(define hello
+(define-public hello
   (package
     (name "hello")
     (version "2.8")
-- 
2.1.1

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix incorrect example package recipe in docs.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Ian Denhardt <ian@zenhack.net> skribis:

> In the section of the manual that first explains how to write a package
> recipe, the example didn't work. The fix is trivial, just use
> define-public instead of define.

Pushed, thanks!

Note that I adjusted the commit log to conform with our conventions, as
described under “Submitting Patches” in ‘HACKING’.

Ludo’.