From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: znavko@disroot.org Subject: Re: Consider the package expr evaluates to. Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:12:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190624154210.GA2857@jurong> <8338cddc3ac2ed3425e5759eabf6e84c@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfSWS-00076w-Do for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:12:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfSWR-0002lv-3U for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:12:52 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:42054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfSWQ-0002k9-3q for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:12:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190624154210.GA2857@jurong> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Andreas Enge Cc: help-guix 'Expression is evaluated'??=0AMaybe better is 'the package that matches e= xpression'?=0A=0A'Consider' - here it means 'to use'. But dictionary mean= ing of 'consider' is 'think about', 'regard' [1], so this is hard for und= erstanding.=0A=0AGuix Manual, in general, has simple language, good under= standing, but sometimes its author cracks reader's mind.=0A=0AHope it wil= l be rewritten and some sensual things (such as partitioning and typing B= ios Grub config) will be added.=0A=0A[1] https://www.lexico.com/en/defini= tion/consider=0A=0AJune 24, 2019 3:50 PM, "Andreas Enge" wrote:=0A=0A> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 06:27:26PM +0000, znavko@disroot.= org wrote:=0A> =0A>> I cannot understand this string from manual:=0A>> "C= onsider the package expr evaluates to."=0A> =0A> This is an English short= cut for the following:=0A> "Consider the package to which expr evaluates.= "=0A> =0A> So when expr is evaluated, it becomes a package; consider this= package.=0A> =0A> Actually I wonder whether it should not be in passive = voice?=0A> "Consider the package to which expr is evaluated?". Native spe= aker needed!=0A> =0A> Andreas