From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUvuZ-000241-Nn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:13:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUvuW-0003I5-I0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:13:11 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUvuW-0003Hv-Em for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:13:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUvuP-0002Gw-QE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:13:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27635] [PATCH] gnu: emacs: Build with imagemagick support. Resent-Message-ID: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Arun Isaac Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:42:04 +0530 In-reply-to: <874luk60jr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d199j5tm.fsf@gmail.com> <874luk60jr.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Alex Vong , 27635@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > Thoughts? Some preliminary thoughts: `guix size emacs' lists cups, cups-minimal, ghostscript and ghostscript-with-cups as dependencies. Can't we do with just cups and ghostscript, or just cups-minimal and ghostscript? Also, there are two builds (different hashes) of cairo-1.14.8 listed. Is it acceptable to build gtk+ with cups-minimal, instead of cups?