Re: Emacs next variants

[Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>]

Am Sonntag, dem 12.03.2023 um 09:18 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin:
> > As for tree-sitter-with/without-gtk, I have no opinion here.  We
> > could try exporting package rewriters so that everyone can have
> > their cup of tea, but maintaining one's own Emacs on the
> > user/channel level ought not to be too difficult either.
> 
> I guess inheriting pgtk from tree-sitter looks most logical here: no
> potential problems for X users, tree-sitter for wayland users. 
> Updated the inheritance hierarchy.
For the future, I think we should be careful not to be too close to the
master branch.  emacs-next has thus far historically been a package to
try out things for the next release, not the one after that.  The
inclusion of a package variant with tree-sitter necessitated a change,
but for packages that don't need it we should go back to tailing pre-
releases as soon as reasonable.

Cheers