Sourcehut packaging

Sourcehut packaging

[Ron Nazarov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 675 bytes --]

Hello,

All Python dependencies of core.sr.ht (which is required by all Python
components of Sourcehut) are now packaged, but it also has 2 npm
dependencies (clean-css and clean-css-cli), these are not yet packaged,
they have the following dependencies (flattened):
 * balanced-match
 * brace-expansion
 * clean-css
 * clean-css-cli
 * commander
 * concat-map
 * fs.realpath
 * glob
 * inflight
 * inherits
 * minimatch
 * once
 * path-is-absolute
 * source-map
 * wrappy (packaged as node-wrappy)

This is not very many dependencies compared to jQuery.

I have not looked at other sourcehut packages yet.

-- 
Ron Nazarov <noisytoot@disroot.org>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: Sourcehut packaging

[Joshua Branson]

Ron Nazarov <noisytoot@disroot.org> writes:

> All Python dependencies of core.sr.ht (which is required by all Python
> components of Sourcehut) are now packaged, but it also has 2 npm
> dependencies (clean-css and clean-css-cli), these are not yet packaged,
> they have the following dependencies (flattened):
>  * balanced-match
>  * brace-expansion
>  * clean-css
>  * clean-css-cli
>  * commander
>  * concat-map
>  * fs.realpath
>  * glob
>  * inflight
>  * inherits
>  * minimatch
>  * once
>  * path-is-absolute
>  * source-map
>  * wrappy (packaged as node-wrappy)

That's awesome!  How cool would it be to have a Sourcehut service in
guix system !?

>
> This is not very many dependencies compared to jQuery.
>
> I have not looked at other sourcehut packages yet.

--
Joshua Branson (joshuaBPMan in #guix)
Sent from Emacs and Gnus
  https://gnucode.me
  https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels
  https://propernaming.org
  "You can have whatever you want, as long as you help
enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar

Re: Sourcehut packaging

[Brendan Tildesley]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 189 bytes --]

Since your working on sourchut, would you also mind taking on adding an update for sourcehut packages, so that guix refresh works for them. There are many of them but no updater currently.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 339 bytes --]

Re: Sourcehut packaging

[Ron Nazarov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 426 bytes --]

On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:35 +0200, Brendan Tildesley wrote:
>  Since your working on sourchut, would you also mind taking on adding
> an update for sourcehut packages, so that guix refresh works for
> them. There are many of them but no updater currently. 
By sourcehut packages, do you mean node packages?
Because I don't think there are any sourcehut packages in Guix yet.

-- 
Ron Nazarov <noisytoot@disroot.org>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: Sourcehut packaging

[Brendan Tildesley]

> On 04/09/2021 11:45 PM Ron Nazarov <noisytoot@disroot.org> wrote:

> By sourcehut packages, do you mean node packages?
> Because I don't think there are any sourcehut packages in Guix yet.
> 
I mean packages with source url's on sr.ht, for example:

guix refresh scdoc 

doesnt have an updater

Re: Sourcehut packaging

[jgart]

We have esbuild. Can esbuild replace clean-css? 

or maybe go-github-com-tdewolff-minify 🤔

https://github.com/tdewolff/minify

What are your thoughts? I'm just thinking out loud here.

all the best,

jgart

Re: Sourcehut packaging

[jgart]

It looks like the Makefile is the only place where csslint is called (atleast, from a quick glance at the source code) so it might work to substitute a different css minifier like one of the ones I mentioned previously and not use the npm deps at all.

What do you think?

We should test it.

--
jgart

April 8, 2021 5:11 PM, "jgart" <jgart@dismail.de> wrote:

> We have esbuild. Can esbuild replace clean-css? 
> 
> or maybe go-github-com-tdewolff-minify 🤔
> 
> https://github.com/tdewolff/minify
> 
> What are your thoughts? I'm just thinking out loud here.
> 
> all the best,
> 
> jgart