From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: t3sserakt <t3ss@posteo.de>
Subject: Re: Reproducible bootstrapping
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:35:51 +0200
Message-ID: <c1c3c5a8366af913a6ffa2fb83002956@posteo.de>
References: <dd04fbde305e89bdc69806102c102633@posteo.de>
	<874m85ctdj.fsf@gnu.org>
	<25ed67bc-3e51-b223-69a7-1bf4fec84a50@posteo.de>
	<878txg33of.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: t3ss@posteo.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43078)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <t3ss@posteo.de>) id 1bKLpn-0000J1-N6
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 04:36:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <t3ss@posteo.de>) id 1bKLpk-0004Yp-1Q
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 04:35:58 -0400
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:40869)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <t3ss@posteo.de>) id 1bKLpj-0004Yb-R5
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 04:35:55 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130])
	by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5A5220ABE
	for <help-guix@gnu.org>; Tue,  5 Jul 2016 10:35:52 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <878txg33of.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ludo@gnu.org
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org

Am 05.07.2016 10:11 schrieb ludo@gnu.org:
> t3sserakt <t3sserakt@posteo.de> skribis:
>=20
>> I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here:
>>=20
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/
>=20
> Currently a large fraction (no exact figure yet) of the packages are
> bit-reproducible, but it=E2=80=99s not 100%.  For example, the .go files
> produced by Guile are not bit-reproducible yet, due to
> <http://bugs.gnu.org/20272>.
>=20
> I haven=E2=80=99t checked recently whether the packages involved in
> =E2=80=98bootstrap-tarballs=E2=80=99 are bit-reproducible.  It would be u=
seful.
>=20
> However, note that the bootstrap binaries we currently use=C2=B9 were bui=
lt
> in 2013 for the most part.  To rebuild them, you would need to do that
> from a Guix checkout of that time.
>=20
> I hope this answers your question.

Yes. Thank you very much!

t3sserakt

>=20
> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>=20
> =C2=B9 ftp://alpha.gnu.org:/gnu/guix/bootstrap