From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKNLe-00069C-88 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:31:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKNLb-00017W-2s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:31:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKNLa-00015E-Hv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:31:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jKNLa-00065f-BC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:31:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40264] Linphone: 11-add-mediastreamer-v2 Resent-Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:30:09 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200403133827.52d529cb@scratchpost.org> References: <20200403133827.52d529cb@scratchpost.org> <981ea9c838575bacfe934a652ceeca62@disroot.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 40264@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Danny!=0A=0A>> + (list=0A>> =0A>> + ;; For fixing definitions.=0A> =0A= > Yes, but why? What would happen if we didn't do it?=0A=0AOtherwise, we = get `-Werror` flag related compilation errors.=0A=0A>> + (origin=0A>> + (= method url-fetch)=0A>> + (uri=0A>> + (string-append "https://gitlab.linph= one.org/BC/public/mediastreamer2/commit"=0A>> + "de3a24b795d7a78e78eab6b9= 74e7ec5abf2259ac.diff"))=0A>> + (file-name "mediastreamer-msfactory.patch= ")=0A> =0A> I'm not sure what the outcome of the latest discussion on car= rying patches was.=0A> Should we carry patches in Guix now or fetch them = from external source?=0A=0AI think it's good as long as we use hash to ve= rify. :-)=0A=0A>> + "-DENABLE_GSM=3DNO" ; Need recompilation with -fPIC= =0A> =0A> Uhhhhhhhhh if that's a library, it should have been compiled wi= th "-fPIC", no?=0A> =0A> Which library would need recompilation with "-fP= IC"?=0A=0AI am not sure about this one. Since it is a feature, I was plan= ning on to deal this later and disable gsm for now. I hope it is okay.=0A= =0ARegards,=0ARG.