bug#46829: `guix pull` uses incorrect certificate store

[Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 875 bytes --]

On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 12:50 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> [...]
> > > We could also add a ‘--no-check-certificates’ option to ‘guix pull’.
> > 
> > I think we should avoid adding "use insecure connection" options. Even
> > if the code itself is signed.
> 
> “Insecure” is a strong word: it still prevents eavesdropping, which is
> the only property that matters in the presence of authenticated
> channels.

Maybe call the option '--tolerate-eavesdropping' then?  That name:

* is technically correct
* doesn't suggest the option is "Insecure"
* but still sounds like something you don't want
* should be clear to people not knowing about TLS' PKI infrastructure,
  ‘will eventually’™ be replaced with GNS + <insert GNUnet protocol here> or
  something like that, which wouldn't use such a centralised structure.

Thoughts?
Maxime.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]