From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4H5pD1rz8mb8ZgEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:14:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4H5pD1rz8mb8ZgEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:14:02 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=qc8ouTH9; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=PA7hDiEQ; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1727198042; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=PAqd3khowxhqa2tB739SG9Ktxz8WpyQuKY7+c194sR8=; b=burDyHEMnQ27CEyqep4TLqK1ygOtMFGC9D8yHUi4JhqKYsbP6F26xAnMXB2YH1zVatX3Hp kt3n3+YI69FLox6SB+CvhfbzkIlj0q6GEzrcc3H4+gXmsZEFkHKi8fQ691wYxzxou4PU1J k6Ivv8LK1Ysfzmr72r52pIY3rMfmh4W2xhueBziOl06baxu3nu/k8MKvR0TghQzdoJ+JUq xhEctyTGEoaGynxdNUBhEHnORpGiMzBSbW20AlTiTscTYeYVcbS/xXAm53OUv7iKjAclo3 rzwSaOfyA+DhIXyiUQm4qC02wVaK/uFTlBJI/FyECRVdeoUJiGQC5yFDcdniIg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1727198042; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DtYW4CiDMcIhuI+nhnEnJx7squVhn3ggESUI8hz5fCb/iBg/1cdZnCGM7XGhWHAAb55hpW jM3jTYXE8rHQ/KhJTkJM91hCpm4oU8YwpyQXB6WxdB6tCnO+aYvVHk4SvnTR0x0bMsAxZO IDPndlVWLN9P1AD8QtuYx7AzzqowCntFvo4QRJ8ov/NUIDrHnz/tpDy+zhScNjfWW3/IBo OG1iCNos9qoPR0rqjBgxAVeiItUeJFQtP5+XYSe9/K86cb+lx9hdYoBXf/5RLFbQTiR9nn XZYF004Yr4V49hKRGBTI7nupMrRJIBsrtIZT8JIYWnN+rCoyxOtClfP4TKrEyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=qc8ouTH9; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=PA7hDiEQ; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB486638D7 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:14:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1st96Z-0004pj-Ai; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:13:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1st96X-0004pH-MU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:13:37 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1st96X-0000HN-EA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:13:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:From:To:Subject; bh=PAqd3khowxhqa2tB739SG9Ktxz8WpyQuKY7+c194sR8=; b=qc8ouTH9NapLcQ/4Ae2WtTDwKBfNdgSNYLshGRgISR+XCis2rbtFXaK9DkVeIqAJnpR81pVP6rEYDt1jFQRg+Wwv3IpWWRD6vGYvs8H7kyFqCrlkm70R0JXJYzx+RETbt6ys80V7vJKR/jp0w7hfYXUYsnv/JtAtGTaB0S3zIOkxfXiSPAlJTYKN6JhqcT61vnT0ZGL31WSmurs+NLz65rV3fzJtBDjE8JIVfIQTW7edP1WQJmxauwQG2BUUO9INkHY89mv3kpYemJEEPGTJr9J7T+UkNvUmoQyeHvENf2nHcN6nuhp2VtwFOcNFX73NEZIvN4eUMLL9OGMTrVkR4g==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1st96v-0000MV-QJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73439] [PATCH 00/10] Update libreoffice to its latest version. Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73439 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Nicolas Graves , 73439@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73439-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73439.17271980111285 (code B ref 73439); Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:14:01 +0000 Received: (at 73439) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2024 17:13:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1st96Q-0000Kd-GM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:13:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com ([209.85.128.65]:53253) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1st96O-0000K9-1W for 73439@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:13:29 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42cb6f3a5bcso74241535e9.2 for <73439@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727197917; x=1727802717; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=PAqd3khowxhqa2tB739SG9Ktxz8WpyQuKY7+c194sR8=; b=PA7hDiEQ2941quPqTEcpfSk6xL6zsGuLstfif9iBuMS0N1HSOJErTLwLqJQAETTO2B IbRDW/MxUFUjBn6+78pnRvI474sELmhsQJrPlRBY0bm23b6Kx54KDktY0UW72Mjz+3EY Op53pStzEH1tLHHbkEo6yPcxap3OhS1mC9DhewBgVEzJ62up/jpRYf21ha5IcM3Ev50e Jfv9KBW0Y9AiRNzVBSufwKU5IE1upj/XpqCgL26MDCDcj7re9H3Qxbej7l2g1u1uZo6q TnTHimzejiAlwHgCIPoneHoj77Oow4kwXeLmlH8BQ0MbZRoVXjg2uraOcojw7e+r6QXI GTqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727197917; x=1727802717; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PAqd3khowxhqa2tB739SG9Ktxz8WpyQuKY7+c194sR8=; b=j5sEzliApwhnaJQsHyYa33gLjX+uyq6mYBkW72dVrnyKLhm0RtM6hQv0BTj+T3PcAp 520rg2D1t6HuttQBA0mhzCXXVsxx5t+P4rQtV2bp5b92J4TyoTPyv4z0iPyGcQ8LMH84 A4yAsZbi3yEfVOHQu7H4r9X4rDRqxpwi9wPBJHbJSpgZ/5R2rvTS/aAPqYX2U3gkecP4 +gBeI7WzQeidR4x0pfezqTjrcaKpoT8Oxn28mqrLqqvmeMY2ivLC+DVd6uI90g0BqWez ho5dUVwTReSRL+CWLWEvvY7VdOd8iEqqgqhiDgxCNka4CViWT78Qb63YsV3Q1ZlDjlY9 Gtgg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXqdarMcoCQ1S+0buIFobXsMiA/QMFc3huMrwg1pXMQIpvsEup2NbggNpfmPyJfrcpsZm+RSQ==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YylIqbsCd8K6BtTQ1w7dXomqApnwpV4IFFCBFclcHPZMxhaALa3 D4H49QtI7mWXbvH62X4sIX2uIHHUZiVk0uiYP7kFKvf+dbtopXVdqiGNGydW X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGK59sTJwtU/2WAqhNE6BZVac273sQV4P74YnABpP+DIwJdnHomf6eTKTYAaXwEZgJj2T5BVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e03:b0:42c:ba83:3f00 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42e7abe3d5dmr171792545e9.1.1727197437167; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-42e754a6643sm165872875e9.29.2024.09.24.10.03.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:03:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ed59w2e7.fsf@ngraves.fr> References: <20240923122128.14126-1-ngraves@ngraves.fr> <6c566955f6a8a134a36523503c179fa7f43ed073.camel@gmail.com> <87ed59w2e7.fsf@ngraves.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.47 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CB486638D7 X-Spam-Score: -10.47 X-TUID: tsUOp+316MEy Am Dienstag, dem 24.09.2024 um 16:29 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Graves: > On 2024-09-23 20:35, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: >=20 > > Am Montag, dem 23.09.2024 um 14:15 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Graves: > > > This patch series updates libreoffice to its latest version. I > > > used > > > local builds of derivations with ccache > > > (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68315) to test developping and > > > updating > > > a big package incrementally. Some commits can be squashed, but I > > > think we should at least keep separate 24.2.0.3, 24.2.6.2, > > > 24.8.1.2. > > > It also adds an updater for the libreoffice package. > > Why those steps?=C2=A0 Should we perhaps have multiple packages with > > some older versions for the time being? >=20 > 24.2.0.3 is a big update which adds packages and substitutions, I > think it's good to keep those changes in one commit. Fair enough. > On the libreoffice website, they have only two libreoffice downloads: > https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download-libreoffice >=20 > 24.8.1.2 is the current stable release > 24.2.6.2 is the previous stable release (~=3D LTS) >=20 > I don't see libreoffice bringing tremendous changes from version to > version, I'm not sure having two versions is necessary. >=20 > That said, it is very doable to have two with a -lts version. I agree, having an LTS is probably enough. So can we cut this short by keeping the separate ones you mention and also keep 24.2.6.2 as the LTS? > >=20 > > > Nicolas Graves (10): > > > =C2=A0 import: Add %libreoffice-updater. > > LGTM > > > =C2=A0 gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.0.3. > > > =C2=A0 gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.1.2. > > > =C2=A0 gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.2.2. > > > =C2=A0 gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.3.2. > > > =C2=A0 gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.4.2. > > > =C2=A0 gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.5.2. > > > =C2=A0 gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.6.2. > > > =C2=A0 gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.8.1.2. > > > =C2=A0 gnu: hunspell-dictionaries: Update to=C2=A0 24.8.1.2. > > As noted in the comment hunspell and libreoffice ought to be kept > > in sync.=C2=A0 IIUC, this would mean updating hunspell-dictionaries in > > lockstep with libreoffice on those intermediate steps as well, no? >=20 > I haven't delved that deep in this but I think it's not necessary. > The reason is that they are mostly dictionaries whose updates are > uncorrelated to what's happenning in libreoffice itself but rather > edge cases in languages.=C2=A0 They are unlikely to break user experience= , > plus it will be for only a few commits.=C2=A0 At the end of the series > seems fine to me. Fair enough. Cheers