From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: Add new package: aspell-dict-pt Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 03:21:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <74004246f90b81f74fceb06ba108ed8a@d4n1.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deWho-0007lc-Ai for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 21:19:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deWhn-0001Ks-9x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 21:19:40 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:cc92::1]:35218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deWhm-0001KQ-K7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 21:19:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <74004246f90b81f74fceb06ba108ed8a@d4n1.org> Content-Language: en-GB List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: d4n1@d4n1.org, guix-devel@gnu.org Daniel, Daniel Pimentel wrote on 07/08/17 at 02:27: > Add new package aspell-dict-pt: gnu/packages/aspell.scm Thanks! I went ahead and fixed up the commit message to match our conventions (see your previous commit to aspell.scm as pushed by Ludo'). Only one small question: the package uses simply ‘pt’ as the language code, while uses ‘pt_PT’. Should we follow that example? Or is it needlessly redundant? I know nothing of the linguistics or politics involved... Kind regards, T G-R