From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia Subject: Re: Guix cookbook Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 11:08:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <60f73aa7-e1ae-2c5d-cf47-c179a54a65ce@s.rendaw.me> <87pnoy7g1c.fsf@gnu.org> <3b95f670-336a-c7e9-b2e0-768e2bb99342@s.rendaw.me> <87ftppxgfi.fsf@gnu.org> <871s19w0ik.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871s18elz8.fsf@elephly.net> <87imujfymk.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o94bs3z9.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQ78f-0001Vs-Et for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 05:20:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQ6tu-0000Q3-Ij for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 05:05:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:54822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQ6tt-0000Oh-8t for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 05:05:38 -0400 Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F551A1CDD for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 02:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBA60120502 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 02:05:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87o94bs3z9.fsf@elephly.net> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org On 2019-05-09 23:38, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >=20 > Pierre Neidhardt writes: >=20 >> I agree with all your points! >> >> Regarding the bootstrapping process: we could already split the >> packaging tutorial into 2 "recipes": >> - A guile primer >> - The actual packaging tutorial >> >> Of course we would interlink them. >> >> Once done, we should not forget to update the blog post to let the >> readers know to refer to the corresponding cookbook instead. >=20 > Sounds good. I=E2=80=99d like to keep the cookbook chapters rather sho= rt and > focused, so splitting things up into independent chapters is fine. +1 This sounds great. I will happily contribute to this. --=20 Cheers Swedebugia