From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id uOvYN7N1cWXpJgAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:35:16 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id uOvYN7N1cWXpJgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:35:16 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5E9571A4 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 08:35:15 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=gS7IoDsz; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1701934515; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=AzMyqWVq6v+m1GWdV9EQRLSy5uS8O5lpdcbUmUhEaTQ=; b=Ge/umIbS0ZuKXfFfm860Wtx8eLifMzj7G88eW/iOZ/7p11NmzXATWlJuxGE4in9vF4QWl6 VdyAB+5f1byFCG7jaY2ksRgnr7bG3XnURjN+KzuAbPFiAkmc6m5FSXUCx7lmPRv0OEkRRx q1QkcfCTUvGcIzZt2kMg/8bXSxlnVplCLKi2rergwRj80MELeuANtjqyDuGz54mi8N7C8/ +JzADLipV1tzqhXiTEOccKoRm/DkqkdNp6zIs1wWLraM31cwp9oO/2WqU3hnGTW42SQAkW 0xHMD6/vT3IgxskDoA4UM/PQEt3tP/O3E9k/Kl4iYgshFb/JLMZCROxlPfaabw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1701934515; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=cx2Es29Tqy277Z1F0aObK9reQSunRpD/JE2Qo+DTa5W49dl75WJ+R5QKhFTHjvqaSTYaE5 aMac8dLDgtCtfVc8IKKaHzCTV9CLcruZsJGqDDPq1HUTx+DHTwFLgAW+/wCMqnaiptGSji dgLECqgJD7lYExzdRzTxnZIFYxHESc16nOLUbfIJsH3GpHG8biwjEePjasIHYFZltKyH7M YifkcLbDbxU+QxvelH4cJBqsWyBmJLH/dH8DZwXQqlqKbgF0qmKPsJNp2gVeGZ0B/OJeNI 6abxFYzox4pZNhHF3JSBnQzK/PGhVSR2ul+wAhguiF62+O+zv+nJaiwoBWaWtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=gS7IoDsz; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rB8uK-0003P8-5m; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 02:34:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rB8uI-0003Os-Ln for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 02:34:50 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rB8uI-0003fC-D8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 02:34:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rB8uU-0006qn-5z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 02:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#67651: [gnome-team] What should we do with the "gnome" package? Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2023 07:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67651 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Vivien Kraus , 67651@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 67651-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67651.170193449526317 (code B ref 67651); Thu, 07 Dec 2023 07:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 67651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2023 07:34:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40940 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rB8uN-0006qP-1i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 02:34:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::443]:51481) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rB8uH-0006q6-H9 for 67651@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 02:34:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-332f90a375eso592645f8f.3 for <67651@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 23:34:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1701934471; x=1702539271; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=AzMyqWVq6v+m1GWdV9EQRLSy5uS8O5lpdcbUmUhEaTQ=; b=gS7IoDsztz67EbBqnX4DTq6WfEZjFpdhklipawgTQ1rjML1Ept9d8DHL76SUADU3K3 AZFwyIssOIFw8oviTLXxXrLBpt3hcBhsMiRAJcFhE6JYByjD/lxgZwryMTkSYZHbmqei MEXi260Pu5VQgWQ+iniw+aZh/UIpTLQ93avoepx7+0Mhj4KrvY2Z5Ac9nPNPmy9rVfA7 N0JMm4kmWHvUrZW56VKsN3MDoO6RRZOQRLQfrh4Mn0RP5UTT+dTP11bWb8Kz5aOFwma5 uB1ClolAP/KcHaSXHDgOXR/uEsSZzerw+UKFtjRHB7KLcoz0CDvmxqWddOE1i6SJdqkK UKjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701934471; x=1702539271; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AzMyqWVq6v+m1GWdV9EQRLSy5uS8O5lpdcbUmUhEaTQ=; b=uvCcISI7Nv3683MwpMRjEZC6Nk+e1zbcM4/HT98XAwigGlFKl1TFCwhsBqfYm4WOmH yXKBb4rg1V6Fyd4xPhf9pV3uArr4K/jHcm7WNiFV6FP3DhdHBIOPx7d2KD15vj9K/pQF F0z2O+6d0f2kkg8/x0gJo5vIZEDKatKS5pekhIIPZX63lsos6lceRdixTDbA1qEX7ZO9 m40tw3EOT8PEmW1PgCtl4FYsdaVEIkalNHC4ju2L0lBHPCLz92z9S4wOFwXi7F9QXnai Rujq0+XXE17w8UmyKiXvw0VJ32xrIpmyRCPkxyPjkqu9NmM9VozWhpDBR0HAgvoEjGMc RGgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwAU15KTsU+IiQ/FiPWztGHwNXcyAbvLiCnl92txIqGA3VVTntc KEK1Byxn9C0KOcfPKoEKroMJTOQjACNOCA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFf0YY0egQQ925rsOKLtb6i1Yab8v/vqfGhG5QLyas6uHPMgAFpiVL+Y1QoDggL+BSJk/Zd1g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f2cf:0:b0:333:560d:e6b1 with SMTP id d15-20020adff2cf000000b00333560de6b1mr1459296wrp.115.1701934471158; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 23:34:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r3-20020a5d52c3000000b00333483b468dsm684263wrv.88.2023.12.06.23.34.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Dec 2023 23:34:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:34:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <271383e7dfc7e1beecc0fcebe533f94e9da4d499.camel@planete-kraus.eu> References: <271383e7dfc7e1beecc0fcebe533f94e9da4d499.camel@planete-kraus.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.98 X-Spam-Score: -3.98 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9F5E9571A4 X-TUID: 7b2FuzN5XMQx Hi Vivien, Am Dienstag, dem 05.12.2023 um 21:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus: > Dear guix, >=20 > On the one hand, we have this list of packages: > https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/44.6/versions >=20 > On the other hand, we have the propagated-inputs of the gnome > package. >=20 > Should we update the latter so that it contains everything from the > former?=C2=A0 No. > What should we do about the comments dividing the propagated- > inputs into categories? Where do these categories come from?=C2=A0 The categories are roughly inferred from a previous categorisation of GNOME Apps. It is a little arcane and should probably be updated to reflect (roughly). Note that we'll still be using the Core Apps from GNOME 44, which are listed in [1]. =20 > Should we preserve them? How do we know which package goes to which > category? We should try to update them and better keep with upstream terms. I think it also makes sense to split the gnome meta-package into multiple meta packages and adjust the gnome-desktop service accordingly. For one, we do need a gnome-shell-meta that has everything required to get a running gnome-shell, even without any of the other core applications. Then, gnome-core-main, gnome-core-mobile and gnome-core-tools could hold the main, mobile and developer tools in the core apps respectively. > The gnome package disables eog on 32-bit machines because it depends > on librsvg-next. It seems a bit outdated to me, as most of gnome > won=E2=80=99t work on 32-bit machines, not only eog. Should we try and fi= nd > which ones work on 32-bit systems? Seeing how GNOME 45 deprecates eog in favour of loupe, yet another bootstrap and build system nightmare, we should anyhow look into what's buildable on 32-bit machines and offer suitable replacements. I'm very much a proponent of reducing the amount of software on our GNOME stack, not piling yet another heap of checksums onto it and calling dependency management done. Cheers [1] https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2023/05/10/gnome-core-apps-update/