From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] gnu: Add perl-file-pushd. Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:44:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170323140056.23173-1-alex@pompo.co> <87lgrv2wht.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87bmsrks7s.fsf@gmail.com> <87inmy4x6c.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S3t8L8xT8C2ceXTmJw1FAJ6G3UB3qVGfM" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crQY3-0001lj-NX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:50:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crQY0-0000pZ-MD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:50:39 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:45135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crQY0-0000pM-FS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:50:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87inmy4x6c.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --S3t8L8xT8C2ceXTmJw1FAJ6G3UB3qVGfM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="PlrcVe8bRcACHg4UBhdMP0fCBivg3Pea7"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] gnu: Add perl-file-pushd. References: <20170323140056.23173-1-alex@pompo.co> <87lgrv2wht.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87bmsrks7s.fsf@gmail.com> <87inmy4x6c.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87inmy4x6c.fsf@gmail.com> --PlrcVe8bRcACHg4UBhdMP0fCBivg3Pea7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alex, On 24/03/17 14:32, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > Building the following 24 packages would ensure 248 dependent packages > are rebuilt: edirect-4.10 perl-modern-perl-1.20150127 [...] >=20 > Does this mean, that in order to test this I would now simply try to > rebuild the 24 listed packages? Yup. I'm not 100% sure if that would also build the original edited packages if they've no dependents (I doubt it), but you've probably done so alread= y. What you will get is a load of deprecation warnings about using =E2=80=98= -=E2=80=99 instead of =E2=80=98@=E2=80=99. Which reminds me that I need to send a ce= rtain one-line patch to guix-patches... Kind regards, T G-R --PlrcVe8bRcACHg4UBhdMP0fCBivg3Pea7-- --S3t8L8xT8C2ceXTmJw1FAJ6G3UB3qVGfM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEqBAEBCgAUBQJY1TDkDRxtZUB0b2JpYXMuZ3IACgkQkczbm0hUG5kjKAgAsp9X wdXGYITMlqN243LGbEwVjkH2Dmh2pCAb5Nux74jhxBeXEcboCgHvXuDnf+Rgo+3T 453NB18tKqEng22bfcqB4DcimhYTTS6sV9rPSLDkKOwMVk7pYzcx6q7JziXi4+0R 6BAOgUlAgmcbLcA4lzk8O687ffIMDmw0xroC5L7cYJe5ZwNpeQmgyTHk2i6PizvT MPkRWUDchzRTXG4dPIlfkwHB6JHdCaB+gN/yYGe1AFOiPIWK1bcZz4ijUQrdRZis PzFqG3/gaNXEO+ysp1/poUcPVIYXajmaA2GmU+LYriaWDjRdp1wNyNlhu7VEeIeM veClo3cL6AtGvA0hgQ== =tkCx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S3t8L8xT8C2ceXTmJw1FAJ6G3UB3qVGfM--