From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add nyx. Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:38:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170130000904.31174-1-me@tobias.gr> <20170130000904.31174-2-me@tobias.gr> <87zii9nki5.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8e04c40c-8060-2f3a-f411-2a978455d7f4@tobias.gr> <87poj4bowq.fsf@gnu.org> <87h94ge4uj.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="omtqw7VRdpaFmaJHqQJD1jRc6hVR57TiM" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYIiY-0004Om-Vv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:38:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYIiV-0001qf-1T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:38:27 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:35495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYIiU-0001qI-R0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:38:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h94ge4uj.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: contact.ng0@cryptolab.net Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --omtqw7VRdpaFmaJHqQJD1jRc6hVR57TiM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="hRxCj64wDww0AwM0wXavqnuPmVqNBFMtm"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: contact.ng0@cryptolab.net Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add nyx. References: <20170130000904.31174-1-me@tobias.gr> <20170130000904.31174-2-me@tobias.gr> <87zii9nki5.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8e04c40c-8060-2f3a-f411-2a978455d7f4@tobias.gr> <87poj4bowq.fsf@gnu.org> <87h94ge4uj.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> In-Reply-To: <87h94ge4uj.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> --hRxCj64wDww0AwM0wXavqnuPmVqNBFMtm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0, Apologies for dragging out the thread, but to avoid any possible confusio= n: On 30/01/17 20:16, ng0 wrote: > I think 1.9 is okay, we can verify if 2.0 works once it's out or=20 > tagged, or whatever. I just packaged the HEAD (so 2.0) as I had no=20 > clue about their versions. This is HEAD (2.0) as well. My "1.9" is fictional, since unless I'm mistaken, using "2.0-1." now would inhibit automatic updates to to "2.0" later. On 30/01/17 16:07, I wrote: > The current package: I'll push this version $soonish. Thanks everyone! Kind regards, T G-R --hRxCj64wDww0AwM0wXavqnuPmVqNBFMtm-- --omtqw7VRdpaFmaJHqQJD1jRc6hVR57TiM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEqBAEBCgAUBQJYj6RcDRxtZUB0b2JpYXMuZ3IACgkQkczbm0hUG5k1GwgAnaT5 UH6SWu3qvj66+74qT1PloFIky3oCiMKilp0L/ec360Pbp2Xj4tTwQ68K8vG6kjsh jc03HY/iS2CutsNPBvucsnkEkTIUDjh1s/ON6iJtsghuKMY/Jh5/P45qDts4+JMu /DDLOPzEKxysBDP9QmViO/OljkeJgbEeanRixuKlrNP47seoAjkKkTUp2LdyYKac ZUMX0Max+WK9mxZWiMBNM1P0AetQ8ajHrg2dXZwPdG64Y3sX4fuQeSubhBkHWt2U EbXhMO0cb/S7+WyfneD59i0eNXAyTYnUtn0Isjsh+TTQF9kwq/CH69Tz66TgsWAX uXSJsIjpy/HYSxaPQg== =xieS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --omtqw7VRdpaFmaJHqQJD1jRc6hVR57TiM--