ng0, Apologies for dragging out the thread, but to avoid any possible confusion: On 30/01/17 20:16, ng0 wrote: > I think 1.9 is okay, we can verify if 2.0 works once it's out or > tagged, or whatever. I just packaged the HEAD (so 2.0) as I had no > clue about their versions. This is HEAD (2.0) as well. My "1.9" is fictional, since unless I'm mistaken, using "2.0-1." now would inhibit automatic updates to to "2.0" later. On 30/01/17 16:07, I wrote: > The current package: I'll push this version $soonish. Thanks everyone! Kind regards, T G-R