From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4PQIDl2cVGHUAgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:03:25 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id KCnDCV2cVGGFLQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:03:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A77AE37D21 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:03:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60318 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVczL-0004r6-HC for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:03:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVcx4-00038n-LW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:01:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVcx4-0004KY-4S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:01:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVcx4-0001EJ-0D for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50860: Core-updates-frozen world rebuild coordination Resent-From: Jack Hill Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50860 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 50860-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50860.16329348423542 (code B ref 50860); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:01:01 +0000 Received: (at 50860) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2021 17:00:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50049 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVcwj-0000uq-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:00:42 -0400 Received: from minsky.hcoop.net ([104.248.1.95]:60060) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVcwe-0000kw-Sp for 50860@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:00:40 -0400 Received: from marsh.hcoop.net ([45.55.52.66]) by minsky.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mVcwZ-0001Dz-J5; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:00:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:00:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Jack Hill X-X-Sender: jackhill@marsh.hcoop.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 50860@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1632935004; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=VG/aDrugNs8GuFFmYRO1WeufHAY89XqGd8ivC7pZTr8=; b=tNcjtS3ydqPWx+Dv8u6rWPE2AQYWIgeg4qgD5IYQgGFwM9eDWA0lS0qxyNPzVJBlR2SSmm LeJeQCq5CGBeFoumgYzvIQM4d4JYU3Pd+oCv3L/iPf/qasFSOlt7xfUFumLQ/B6tbKlLqg jAN969V/Cya5psCxIOga3H26dPkwHzrWZX6tqIkOBIYEcgHY/TV2Bf1KT1PhMj/yQo0MCL wYNdx2us5FTqMo4vDZE7sY9baeA9teYaS375YvfzQvWqxxhec+Ryl+o9A6jTZI8nFg5K3Q UX6aMVhRNtyVQAg0nixG2ClP/WGJIoQfLGNPzkJ1PSemzib60snwCTNBeylPjw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1632935004; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ragGtOOcbRIX2A4sZQWgheuFDoo2TtxeKt6yCKa5vYORWKWP8IMQv+v4ieJAgGZ0xQpj/y QecUJrDC6Wx6Zj0TR7cTf/ZK16AQ57eKbrLBw35YtuunOCO2Gyo2ejTDrpixV5SbGI7xtZ j7448pjN0hmV1SRz8kGXADoffiVk4atYQZ/kNaEIuFK+80a8GDWMQtGf649aCdJeWIXETe RweDY62hHmuny+wCyiHwkQH9Jxy+HossU0OIgqauzupor9AI8PRkuINIv7ucUsLiqJ/yw4 xuT5kFMM7jhH5xmrB5Pd0aVA4aNmVeuEAFElJk93liAgTaLEJwmPwGTw4g+Fqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.40 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A77AE37D21 X-Spam-Score: -2.40 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: WYf17GyCwesW On Wed, 29 Sep 2021, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:38:33AM +0000, John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: >> Thanks for coordinating this Leo. Is there anything else with huge rebuilds to push together? > > We are moving the coordination to , > which already existed for this purpose. I hadn't really noticed it > properly! > >> I don't want to keep finding and adding things, but two possibilities come to mind that I've just noticed: >> >> 1a. p11-kit #49957 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49957 >> >> I've just hit this bug on core-updates-frozen as well, though was originally reported on master. As I noted there, I tried to test with just grafts but didn't fix it for me (I'm guessing grafting won't work with that configure flag change). The patch matches how nix configures p11-kit as well, due to this bug. > > If that bug primarily affects Flatpak, I suggest using the solution you > described, which is to create another p11-kit package and use it for > Flatpak. I'm not sure the flatpak/p11-kit problem will be so easily fixed. As I understand it, flatpak talks to a p11-kit server process over a socket. The server may have been started by something other than flatpak, so it might not be the fixed version. > If you still think 1a or 1b are important to include in the current > core-updates cycle, please let us know in #50358! I'm not comfortable deciding whether or not this should block the merge, so I'll defer to someone else who has more experience making those types of judgments. Best, Jack